My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06972
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:29 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:40:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Method of Estimate Effects of Flow-Induced Vegetation Changes on Channel Conveyances of Streams in Central Arizona
Date
1/1/1998
Prepared For
Central Arizona
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the end of the report). Because of logistical con- <br />straints, such as protruding branches, however, the <br />dynamometer was not always placed at this posi- <br />tion on the vegetation. The relation of bending <br />moment to height of vegetation was determined for <br />each vegetation type (fig. 3). Additionally, equa- <br />tions were developed by regression techniques of <br />the bending moment with height for each of the <br />four vegetation types (table 3). <br /> <br />Table 3. Regression equations relating bending <br />moment to vegetation height for saltcedar, willow, <br />mesquite, and palo verde <br /> <br />[8M. bending moment in foot pounds; H, height of vegetation in feet] <br /> <br />Vegetation type <br />Saltcedar ............... <br />Willow,.......,......." <br />Mesquite............... <br />Palo verde............. <br /> <br />Equation <br />BM = 100.102H + 0.880 <br />BM = 100.122H + 0.581 <br />BM = 100. 1 24H +0.935 <br />BM= 100.17]H+0.848 <br /> <br />Coefficient of <br />determination <br />(r') <br /> <br />0,87 <br /> <br />,98 <br /> <br />,88 <br /> <br />.86 <br /> <br />The bending moment (also referred to as <br />flexural strength or stiffness) of the vegetation at <br />varying heights can be estimated from the <br />equations in table 3, For example, a flexural <br /> <br />2,500 <br />2,000 <br /> <br /> 1,000 <br />rn 700 <br />0 <br />z 500 <br />:::J <br />0 400 <br />a. <br />~ 300 <br />0 <br />0 200 <br />LI. <br />;!; <br />,..: <br />z 100 <br />w <br />::; 70 <br />0 <br />::; 50 <br />(') <br />z 40 <br />is 30 <br />z <br />w <br />'" 20 <br /> 10 <br /> 7 <br /> 6 <br /> 2 <br /> <br />strength of 63.2 fi-Ib is estimated for a ] O-foot-tall <br />willow; whereas, a flexural strength of 36] fi-Ib is <br />estimated for a 10-foot-tall palo verde. The <br />assumption, therefore, is that a lone palo verde in <br />midchannel, is thought to be substantially more <br />likely to resist bending when it is subjected to a <br />similar magnitude of stream power and similar <br />degree of submergence as a lone willow tree in <br />midchannel. <br /> <br />Although uncertainties are associated with this <br />simplified approach, data collected during this <br />investigation seem to support these assumptions, <br />For example, figure 4 shows a lone willow about <br />IS fi tall that was laid over during a flow of <br />6,590 fi3/S; whereas, figure 5 shows a lone <br />16-foot-tall palo verde that remained erect <br />throughout a flow of 9,760 fi3/S. Duration of flow <br />for the events was about equal. The magnitude of <br />stream power that affected the palo verde was <br />20.2 fi-Ib/s/ft'; whereas, the magnitude of stream <br />power to which the willow was subjected is equal <br />to 12.9 fi-lb/s/fi' (table I). These data indicate that <br />the large flexural strength of the palo verde enabled <br />it to resist the stream power that was substantially <br />larger than the computed stream power that altered <br />or laid over a willow with similar dimensions. The <br /> <br /> <br />" <br />,," <br />" <br />J-/ <br />,," . <br />" <br />" <br />." <br />" . <br />". <br />" <br />" <br />,," . <br />" <br />,,". <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />... <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />... PALO VERDE <br /> <br />. MESQUITE <br />. SAL TCEDAR <br />... WILLOW <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />VEGETATION HEIGHT, IN FEET <br /> <br />Figure 3. Bending-moment values for four types of vegetation in central Arizona. <br /> <br />10 Method to Estimate Effects of Flow-Induced Vegetation Changes on Channel Conveyances of Streams in Central Arlzone <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.