Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />Six Streams Group I Hydrology, Second Creek & Third Creek <br />April 1, 1975 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />more severe flooding conditions. However, the probability of <br />occurrences for such a combination of storm events such as a <br />thunderhead moving over the basin at a constant lag time ahead <br />of the flood peak is considered to be much less than the basin <br />wide 100-year storm event assumed here. The basin wide storm <br />event is a reasonable and consistent meteorlogical event upon <br />which to base a flood plain management program. <br /> <br /> <br />After evaluation of the soil characteristics, infiltration <br />rate, and pervious-impervious storage, the following hydro- <br />logical factors assumed to be typical of the basin were se- <br />lected and used in the computation of effected rainfall: <br /> <br />Impervious depression and detention storage <br />Pervious depression and detention storage <br />Impervious loss <br />Infiltration for I-hour <br /> <br />.05"-.1" <br />.30"-.35" <br />5% <br />.50" <br /> <br />SECTION D - HYDROGRAPHS <br /> <br />Design storm hydrographs were computed at each of the design <br />points for the 100-year storm frequency. Prior to calculating <br />the storm hydrographs at each design point, storm hydrographs <br />were calculated for each of the sub-basins. These sub-basin <br />hydrographs were then lagged and added to obtain flows at each <br />of the design points. Because of the complexity of this pro- <br />cedure, and due to the number of hydrographs which have to be <br />considered in an analysis of this type, the total process of <br />computing the storm hydrograph, lagging and adding to the next <br />downstream design point, has been computerized to operate an <br />IBM 370 computer using disk storage. <br /> <br />! <br />(i.'" <br /> <br />, /' <br />( In completing the hydrology, flood plain storage was not con- <br />')Sidered ~n ~h7 lower reaches wher7 flc;>od fringe storage ~ould <br />~play a s~gn~f~cant role. Channel~zat~on could result wh~ch <br />,._d' ) will eliminate the present storage within the flood plain, <br />therefore, the developed sub-basin hydrographs were simply <br />lagged and added assuming no channel storage or flood peak <br />reduction. <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />l~t. <br /> <br />Ii r <br />I <br /> <br />A summary of the peak flows for each creek for the 100-year <br />frequency storm under a future developed condition, is pro- <br />vided on the discharge profile identified as Figure I. The <br />Peak Flows are also tabulated in Table 3, Design Point Flows. <br /> <br />To supplement discharge profiles, plotted hydrographs have been <br />attached as Figures II-IX. The hydrographs are representative <br />of projected, planned conditions in the basins above each <br />design point. <br />