Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CY\ <br /> <br />5-2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />8 City of Littleton <br /> <br /> <br />Massey Draw and SJCD ISouth) Major Drainageway Pianning Update <br />Conceptual Design Report <br />February 2006 <br /> <br />Culvert Improvements: The Jefferson County criterion for culvert overtopping does not allow <br />overtopping during the 5-year storm. Twelve inches of overtopping is allowed during the 100-year <br />event on local and collector streets. On arterial streets, a minimum clearance between the energy <br />grade line and the bridge low chord, or culvert crown, is required during the 100-year event. The <br />minimum clearance varies from 6 inches to 2 feet, depending on the size of the upstream watershed. <br />The project sponsors agreed that this minimum clearance criterion was too restrictive for evaluating <br />existing culverts. It was agreed that culvert improvements that eliminated the culvert overtopping <br />during the 1 OO-year storm would be evaluated. Advantages and disadvantages of culvert <br />improvements include the following: <br /> <br />Advantaaes <br />· Roadway overtopping can be reduced or eliminated, increasing safety for motorists and <br />citizens (damage incurred from overtopping can also be reduced or eliminated). <br />. Inadvertent detention upstream of embankments can be reduced or eliminated, reducing the <br />width of the floodplain upstream of the culvert. <br /> <br />sediment basin to remove sediment from the stream flow is difficult to estimate not knowing the <br />gradation of the sediment. Because of the unknowns related to sizing and effectiveness, sediment <br />basins were not further evaluated. <br /> <br />Wetland bottom channels were considered as a means to filter out sediments and nutrients during low <br />flows. Because of the wide bottom width of this type of channel, only those reaches that do not already <br />have extensive wetland bottoms and that are not already developed as parks, green belts, or golf <br />courses were considered. <br /> <br />The advantages and disadvantages of wetland bottom channels are: <br /> <br />Advantaaes <br />. Enhanced water quality and reduced sediment loads. <br />. Wildlife habitat creation. <br />. Floodplain storage. <br />. Channel stabilization. <br /> <br />Disadvantaaes <br />. Culvert replacement can be expensive for a small amount of benefit. <br />. Elimination or reduction of inadvertent detention can increase peak flows downstream of the <br />improved culvert. <br /> <br />Disadvantaaes <br />. Cost to obtain the necessary land. <br /> <br />Easement / Propertv Acauisition: Along drainageway reaches that cross private property, the area <br />needed for drainage easements was identified. The easement area was estimated by using the 100- <br />year floodplain limits from the hydraulic analysis. Properties where structures were shown to be <br />flooded in the hydraulic model were identified for possible acquisition, Following are advantages and <br />disadvantages of easement and/or property acquisition: <br /> <br />Status Quo: The status quo or "do nothing" alternative was considered for each reach. In some <br />reaches, potential improvements were not recommended based on a combination of cost, level of <br />benefit achieved, and feasibility. The advantages and disadvantages of maintaining the status quo <br />are: <br /> <br />Advantaaes <br />. Low/no cost. <br /> <br />Advantaaes <br />. Floodplain preservation. <br />. Elimination of private ownership of impacted property. <br />. Easements and acquisitions provide access for maintenance, <br />. Easements and acquisitions help ensure continued floodplain function by restricting building <br />within the floodplain, <br /> <br />Disadvantaaes <br />. Continued channel degradation. <br />. Possible high operation and maintenance costs. <br />. Property flooding. <br />. Culvert overtopping. <br />. Decreased public safety. <br /> <br />Disadvantaaes <br />. Cost of obtaining easement or property. <br /> <br />Deer Creek Golf Course and Meadow Ranch Alternatives: Six alternatives to prevent structure <br />flooding in the Meadow Ranch area along Deer Creek Golf Club were evaluated, The alternatives <br />evaluated include culvert improvements, levee construction, channel construction, and regional <br />detention. <br /> <br />Reaional Water Qualitv Facilities: Regional facilities to enhance stormwater quality were evaluated. <br />The water quality capture volume and estimated land area needed for extended dry detention basins <br />were estimated. The land requirement was considered to be excessive and extended detention basins <br />were not considered any further, Water quality settling ponds are being constructed on SJCD (South) <br />and North Tributary on the Centennial Water and Sanitation District's South Platte Reservoir property. <br /> <br />5,3 Alternative Evaluation <br /> <br />Other means to enhance stormwater quality that were considered include sediment basins and <br />wetland channels. If the channels are stabilized and the watershed is fully developed, it is believed <br />that the primary source of sediment would be street sand and gravel deposited into the drainageway at <br />each storm sewer outfall. There is not a good method to estimate the quantity of sand and gravel that <br />could be deposited into the drainageways from the streets. Furthermore, the effectiveness of a <br /> <br />Improvements were identified and evaluated to alleviate the identified problems along each of the <br />reaches. Because improvements have been constructed along Massey Draw downstream of <br />Wadsworth and improvements have been constructed along SJCD (South) downstream of South <br />Platte Canyon Road, these reaches were not included in the alternatives evaluation. The alternative <br />improvements that were evaluated include channel stabilization and improvements, floodplain <br />