My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06961
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06961
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:28 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:37:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Community
Littleton
Stream Name
Massey Draw and SJCD South
Basin
South Platte
Title
Conceptual Design Report for Massey Draw and SJCD (South) Mjor Drainageway Planning Update
Date
2/1/2006
Prepared For
Jefferson County
Prepared By
Olsson Associates
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CY\ <br /> <br />5-2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />8 City of Littleton <br /> <br /> <br />Massey Draw and SJCD ISouth) Major Drainageway Pianning Update <br />Conceptual Design Report <br />February 2006 <br /> <br />Culvert Improvements: The Jefferson County criterion for culvert overtopping does not allow <br />overtopping during the 5-year storm. Twelve inches of overtopping is allowed during the 100-year <br />event on local and collector streets. On arterial streets, a minimum clearance between the energy <br />grade line and the bridge low chord, or culvert crown, is required during the 100-year event. The <br />minimum clearance varies from 6 inches to 2 feet, depending on the size of the upstream watershed. <br />The project sponsors agreed that this minimum clearance criterion was too restrictive for evaluating <br />existing culverts. It was agreed that culvert improvements that eliminated the culvert overtopping <br />during the 1 OO-year storm would be evaluated. Advantages and disadvantages of culvert <br />improvements include the following: <br /> <br />Advantaaes <br />· Roadway overtopping can be reduced or eliminated, increasing safety for motorists and <br />citizens (damage incurred from overtopping can also be reduced or eliminated). <br />. Inadvertent detention upstream of embankments can be reduced or eliminated, reducing the <br />width of the floodplain upstream of the culvert. <br /> <br />sediment basin to remove sediment from the stream flow is difficult to estimate not knowing the <br />gradation of the sediment. Because of the unknowns related to sizing and effectiveness, sediment <br />basins were not further evaluated. <br /> <br />Wetland bottom channels were considered as a means to filter out sediments and nutrients during low <br />flows. Because of the wide bottom width of this type of channel, only those reaches that do not already <br />have extensive wetland bottoms and that are not already developed as parks, green belts, or golf <br />courses were considered. <br /> <br />The advantages and disadvantages of wetland bottom channels are: <br /> <br />Advantaaes <br />. Enhanced water quality and reduced sediment loads. <br />. Wildlife habitat creation. <br />. Floodplain storage. <br />. Channel stabilization. <br /> <br />Disadvantaaes <br />. Culvert replacement can be expensive for a small amount of benefit. <br />. Elimination or reduction of inadvertent detention can increase peak flows downstream of the <br />improved culvert. <br /> <br />Disadvantaaes <br />. Cost to obtain the necessary land. <br /> <br />Easement / Propertv Acauisition: Along drainageway reaches that cross private property, the area <br />needed for drainage easements was identified. The easement area was estimated by using the 100- <br />year floodplain limits from the hydraulic analysis. Properties where structures were shown to be <br />flooded in the hydraulic model were identified for possible acquisition, Following are advantages and <br />disadvantages of easement and/or property acquisition: <br /> <br />Status Quo: The status quo or "do nothing" alternative was considered for each reach. In some <br />reaches, potential improvements were not recommended based on a combination of cost, level of <br />benefit achieved, and feasibility. The advantages and disadvantages of maintaining the status quo <br />are: <br /> <br />Advantaaes <br />. Low/no cost. <br /> <br />Advantaaes <br />. Floodplain preservation. <br />. Elimination of private ownership of impacted property. <br />. Easements and acquisitions provide access for maintenance, <br />. Easements and acquisitions help ensure continued floodplain function by restricting building <br />within the floodplain, <br /> <br />Disadvantaaes <br />. Continued channel degradation. <br />. Possible high operation and maintenance costs. <br />. Property flooding. <br />. Culvert overtopping. <br />. Decreased public safety. <br /> <br />Disadvantaaes <br />. Cost of obtaining easement or property. <br /> <br />Deer Creek Golf Course and Meadow Ranch Alternatives: Six alternatives to prevent structure <br />flooding in the Meadow Ranch area along Deer Creek Golf Club were evaluated, The alternatives <br />evaluated include culvert improvements, levee construction, channel construction, and regional <br />detention. <br /> <br />Reaional Water Qualitv Facilities: Regional facilities to enhance stormwater quality were evaluated. <br />The water quality capture volume and estimated land area needed for extended dry detention basins <br />were estimated. The land requirement was considered to be excessive and extended detention basins <br />were not considered any further, Water quality settling ponds are being constructed on SJCD (South) <br />and North Tributary on the Centennial Water and Sanitation District's South Platte Reservoir property. <br /> <br />5,3 Alternative Evaluation <br /> <br />Other means to enhance stormwater quality that were considered include sediment basins and <br />wetland channels. If the channels are stabilized and the watershed is fully developed, it is believed <br />that the primary source of sediment would be street sand and gravel deposited into the drainageway at <br />each storm sewer outfall. There is not a good method to estimate the quantity of sand and gravel that <br />could be deposited into the drainageways from the streets. Furthermore, the effectiveness of a <br /> <br />Improvements were identified and evaluated to alleviate the identified problems along each of the <br />reaches. Because improvements have been constructed along Massey Draw downstream of <br />Wadsworth and improvements have been constructed along SJCD (South) downstream of South <br />Platte Canyon Road, these reaches were not included in the alternatives evaluation. The alternative <br />improvements that were evaluated include channel stabilization and improvements, floodplain <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.