My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06938
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06938
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:36:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Nationwide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Storm Drainage and Urban Region Flood Control Planning
Date
10/1/1974
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING CONCEPTS <br /> <br />The Utility Concept <br /> <br />It is useful to develop an overall attitude or conceptual approach <br /> <br />to planning stonnwater management systems. A recent paper (8) describes <br /> <br />planning in its historical context as Uthe utility approach. U It is <br /> <br />described as having the following components: <br /> <br />U(a) basic indicators such as population or gross national product <br />are extrapolated to project a future situation (b) the future <br />is converted by per capita use or some similar factor into a <br />demand or need for a product or service (c) the need or demand <br />is considered to be a mandate for action and (d) plans were made <br />to ful fi 11 the demand and are justifi ed by it. U <br /> <br />The components can be related to planning storm drainage system as <br /> <br />follows: (a) the basic indicators such as population and gross national <br /> <br />product are projected for future conditions; (b) these projections are <br /> <br />related to the intensity of land use, therefore one determines the future <br /> <br />land requirement and a reasonable amount of this requirement is allocated <br /> <br />to the watershed and/or flood plain under study, and (c) the demand, therefore, <br /> <br />is to provide protection for this expected future land use and since this <br /> <br />is a public service it is justified by its need. <br /> <br />The utility approach has'some implicit logic that is not always con- <br /> <br />sidered by those applying it, They can be described a3 follows: (1) popula- <br /> <br />tion and other basic trends at'e the inevitable consequences of static public <br /> <br />values aDd choices, (2) the utility has the responsibility to meet the <br /> <br />needs for services implied by the projections of such trends, (3) the hard- <br /> <br />ware to provide the services is justified by the need. This logic and the <br /> <br />utility approach in effect characterizes the planning and the provision <br /> <br />of the faci 1 i ti es as that of always s trugg 1 i ng to barely keep ahead of the <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.