Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Enclosed please find the computer output for James <br />Creek reflecting the above revisions. Should you <br />have any questions or comments concerning this <br />correspondence, please advise. <br /> <br /> <br />/i?;:~~, <br /> <br />Since discharges for the 10, 50 , and 500 -year st 0 rm,l~:}' : <:'()/....<:. .';" <br />do not have the same degree of correlation, we hate', 4, '<'c,"'. ',." <br />questions pertaining to the methodology used by th'e.. 'C:'?,g : ";'(.~,,-- <br />Corps of Engineers in determining their skew Co c.> :c";/~ <br />coefficient. The positive coefficient developed-~, ',<:_. 18& . I/' <br />the Corps of Engineers was based on surface water 011 7 / <br />stations which are not representative of the ' ~0 / <br />Jamestown area. The generalized skew coefficients "(, ,;/ <br />published in United States Water Resouces Council ~j~o <br />Bulletin No. 17 indicate a negative skew coefficient <br />for the Jamestown area. <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />H~EDLES TAMMEN & B~GENDOFF <br /> <br />c--Z?~~ C::r a-~ <br /> <br />Charles W. Carroll <br /> <br />Enclosure <br /> <br />cc: Eugene I. Jencsok <br />