Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />during the sluicing tests. During these tests, the flow through the Englewood intake was set at <br />30 ft' /s. <br /> <br />The city of Englewood currently operates at radial gate settings ranging from 2 to 8 feet to sluice <br />sediment for riverflows ranging from 200 to 3,000 ft' /s. At 3,000 ft' /s, the upstream water intakes <br />must be closed due to sediment buildup, even with the sluice gate fully opened. These sluicing flows <br />would draw boaters to the barrier and pin the boats against it; therefore, the sluicing flows would <br />be unacceptable for boating. <br /> <br />In order to improve sluicing and reduce the risk to boaters, the low wall currently in front of the <br />intakes was increased in height to match the present elevation of the primary intake wall <br />(5296.5 feet). All of the water entering the intake area was forced to enter at the upstream end <br />of the intake. The high wall extends downstream to the crest of the existing dam and has a I-foot <br />opening, as shown on figure 3, to allow small amounts of debris to exit the sluiceway. In order to <br />assess the effect of this change, velocities were measured in the intake area with and without the <br />high wall in place. Table 2 summarizes the data. <br /> <br />As shown by the data, the sluicing action is greatly enhanced by adding the high wall. The same <br />velocity can be obtained at a 25-percent gate opening with the high wall as with a 100-percent gate <br />opening with a low wall. When the sediment test was conducted with 3,OOO-ft' /s riverflow and a 30- <br />percent gate opening with the high wall, the primary intake area was almost entirely sluiced out; <br />therefore, sluicing is much more effective with the high wall. <br /> <br />The radial gate can be operated automatically (as it is now) to maintain a constant water surface <br />of about 5290 feet. At riverflows of 50 to 150 ft' /s, all or most of the flow enters the Englewood <br />intake channel. As the riverflow increases, the radial gate can be adjusted to facilitate sluicing. The <br />model tests indicated that a sluiceway gate opening of about 50 percent would provide maximum <br />sluicing capacity (table 2). <br /> <br />Approach flow to Englewood intake. - With the high wall in place, an open bar barrier or other type <br />of open barrier will be required to prevent boaters from entering the sluice at the upstream end. <br />A series of tests were conducted to determine the required placement of the barrier. Figures 41 <br />through 43 show velocities measured for various operating conditions, including river discharges of <br />240, 811, and 1,450 ft' /s. Three different barrier locations were considered. The tests show that <br />the angle of the velocity vector with the barrier would pin the boats against the barrier unless the <br />barrier extends upstream parallel to the angle of the Englewood primary intakes (recommended <br />barrier location on the figures). For this position, the magnitude of the velocity component <br />perpendicular to the barrier does not exceed 2.5 ft/s and the component parallel to the barrier is <br />larger. This would tend to move the boats downstream parallel to the barrier rather than pinning <br />them against the barrier. <br /> <br />Sediment tests. - A typical bedload particle size distribution curve was obtained from WWE for this <br />section of the South Platte River near Oxford Avenue, located approximately] mile downstream <br />of Union Avenue. The particle size distribution curve was scaled based on techniques outlined in <br />the Sediment Scaling section of this report. Estimates of bedload discharge rate were made for a <br />large spring flow of 3,000 ft' /s, which has a return period of 10 years (Wright Water Engineers. <br />1987). <br /> <br />10 <br />