Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The third version of the model, or the "micro-BASIC" version, has been <br />developed for use on micro-computers with BASIC compilers. This version <br />performs the same computations and requires the same data input as the <br />FORTRAN version and its storage requirements are small enough for it to fit <br />on most micro-computers. The "short" option available in the FORTRAN <br />version is provided in this version as well. Also, a hybrid of this version <br />has been developed for use on a hand-held, programmable computer (See <br />Appendices IlIa and IV). A listing of the BASIC code and an example run is <br />included in Appendix III. <br /> <br />IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In both real-time forcasting and disaster preparedness planning, there <br />is a clear need for a fast and economical method of predicting dam-break <br />floodwave peak stages and travel times. The SMPDBK model fills this need, <br />producing such predictions quickly, inexpensively and with reasonable <br />accuracy. For example, in test analyses of the Teton and Buffalo Creek dam <br />failures, approximating the channel as a prism, calculating the maximum <br />breach outflow and stage at the dam, defining the routing parameters, and <br />evaluating the peak stage and travel time to the forecast points required <br />less than 20 minutes of time with the aid of a non-programable hand-held <br />calculator while the average error in forecasted peak flow and travel time <br />was 10-20% with stage errors of approximately 1 ft. Furthermore, compari- <br />sons of SMPDBK model results with DAMBRK model results from test runs of <br />theoretical dam breaks show the simplified model produces average errors of <br />10% or less. The authors had the advantages, however, of prior experience <br />with the model and possession of all required input data, the collection of <br />which consumes precious warning response time in a dam-break emergency. <br /> <br /> <br />To help reduce the time required for data collection, default values <br />for some of the input data are presented in Appendix I. These default <br />values may be used by dam-break flood forecasters when time is short and <br />reliable data are unavailable. Additionally, to help further reduce. the <br />time needed to employ the model, computerized versions of the model have <br />been developed for FORTRAN-compatible mini-computers and for BASIC language <br />micro-computers and programmable hand-held computers (see Appendices II and <br />III.) <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />The SMPDBK model is not only useful in a dam-break emergency, it is <br />also suitable for pre-computation of flood peak elevations and travel times <br />prior to a dam failure. Pre-computation of dam failures allows those <br />responsible for community preparedness to delineate danger areas downstream <br />should the dam fail. Ideally, to obtain the most reliable estimate of <br />probable flood elevations and travel times, the sophisticated NWS DAMBRK <br />model would be used in a long-term disaster preparedness study where <br />sufffcient computer resources are available. However, for short term <br />studies with limited resources, the SMPDBK model will be most helpful in <br />defining approximate peak stages, discharges, and travel times. <br /> <br />In closing, the authors would like to stress that while the SMPDBK <br />model can be a very useful tool in preparing for and during a dam failure <br />event, the user must keep in mind the model's limitations (Fread 1981). <br />First of all, as with all dam breach flood routing models, the validity of <br />the SMPDBK model's prediction depends upon the accuracy of the required <br /> <br />7 <br />