My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06897
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06897
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:15 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:34:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Wellington
Stream Name
Boxelder Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Boxelder Creek Watershed Hydrologic Analyses
Date
12/1/1998
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
UDFCD
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />(1974). Hansen and others (1978), and Jarrett and otherS-(in review) noted that maximum <br />rainfall amounts in eastern Colorado are located on or near the crest of the Palmer Divide (fig. <br />1). Jarrett and others (in review) analyzed extreme rainstorm data for eastern Colorado <br />(McKee and Doesken, 1997) with respect to topographic relief. They found maximum rainfall <br />amounts exceed 12 inches for convective storm in areas of high topographic relief (crest of the <br />Palmer Divide, isolated ridges and buttes, Raton Mesa, Cheyenne Ridge, and the foothills); <br />maximum rainfall was less than about 10 inches for convective storms in areas of low <br />topographic relief. About 75 percent of the high plains of eastern Colorado has local relief of <br />less than about 300 ft in less than 3 miles. It is important to note that localized cells of <br />maximum rainfall in Eastern Colorado are extremely localized (fig. 1; Follansbee and Spiegel, <br />1937; Follansbee and Sawyer, 1948; Matthai, 1969; Snipes and others, 1974; Hansen and <br />others, 1978; Hansen and others, 1988), and also that the maximum cells primarily resulted <br />from different storms. <br /> <br /> <br />Flood data for basins in eastern Colorado that have relatively low TR, which most likely would <br />not have a substantial orographic enhancement to precipitation, also are shown on figure 4. <br />Low TR data plot on or below the envelope curve of maximum flooding for Cherry Creek and <br />substantially below "other" Palmer Divide streams having high topographic relief (fig. 4) and <br />support the hypothesis that topography enhances rainfall-producing floods. <br /> <br />2. The two largest rainstorms (1935 and 1965) in Colorado were located on the Palmer Divide <br />(McKee and Doesken, 1997). The May 30-31, 1935 Hale-Cherry Creek rainstorm <br />(Follansbee and Spiegel, 1937; Hansen and others, 1988) was reported to have produced up to <br />24 inches of rain in about 10 hours with two distinct rainstorm cells (fig. 1). One cell was <br />located about 150 mi east of Denver near Hale in the Republican River basin (local relief about <br />300 ft), and a second cell was reported over the headwaters of Cherry Creek basin. Jarrett and <br />others (in review) reviewed 1935 rainfall-bucket survey data and rainfall data for stations <br />near the Palmer Divide. They found that maximum rainfall estimates for both cells were <br />measured in stock tanks, which are used to store water for animals. Approximately 6 to 10 <br />inches of rain fell in the week preceding May 30, 1935. Jarrett and others (in review) <br />suggest that it is very unlikely preceding rainwater was emptied from the stock tank, <br />particularly during a severe drought period (Collins and others, 1991), and concluded the May <br />30-31,1935 total rainfall amount was about 14 to 18 inches for each cell. Flood discharges <br />from these revised rainfall amounts are more consistent with maximum flood discharges for the <br />1965 storm, which had similar rainfall amounts but larger flood discharges than in 1935 <br />(Matthai, 1969). <br /> <br />Historical records indicate significant flooding did not occur in 1935 in Cherry Creek (U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers, 1976) nor in Running Creek (Water Resources Consultants, 1979). <br />The 1935 Cherry Creek cell apparently was misnamed and should be referred to as the Kiowa- <br />Bijou cell, which did have large rainfall amounts and extreme flooding in 1935 (Matthai, <br />1969). The location of maximum rainfall in 1935 and 1965 was on the divide between Kiowa <br />and Bijou Creeks (fig. 1) where local relief is about 300 to 500 ft in less than a mile. The <br />June 16-17, 1965 rainstorm did not produce significant rainfall nor any flooding in the <br />headwaters of Cherry Creek and Running Creek (Matthai, 1969; Water Resources Consultants, <br />1979). The peak discharge was 1,000 ft3/S in Cherry Creek near Franktown (06712000) on <br />June 16, 1965 at 1945 hrs, but occurred after the flood peak at the Melvin gage; the flood of <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.