My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06897
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06897
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:15 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:34:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Wellington
Stream Name
Boxelder Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Boxelder Creek Watershed Hydrologic Analyses
Date
12/1/1998
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
UDFCD
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Age estimates for paleoflood deposits in this study were based on relative-age criteria as <br />described by Waythomas and Jarrett (1994) and Jarrett and Wa:rthomas (in press). Relative- <br />age techniques used for this study were based on the degree of soil development, age of trees <br />located on flood-deposited sediments, and amount of decay of woody-flood debris. Complete <br />decay of woody-flood debris in semiarid and arid climates such as in Colorado can take over 100 <br />years (Jarrett, in review a), and in some streams recognizable woody-flood debris has been <br />14C dated up to 2,300 years B.P. old (D. Levish, Bureau of Reclamation, pers. commun., <br />1997). <br /> <br />The strategy of a paleoflood investigation is to visit the most likely places where evidence of <br />out-of-bank flooding, if any, might be preserved. Aerial photograohs for much of Box Elder <br />Creek provided by CH2MHILL and Fowler and Associates in Denv,~r were useful in identifying <br />paleoflood sites and PSis. Onsite paleoflood data were collected for Cherry Creek and Box Elder <br />Creek basins and numerous other streams draining from the Palmer Divide. <br /> <br />Regional Analyses of Flood Data <br /> <br />It is essential to ascertain the flood history for other basins in thl, region, which is broadly <br />defined as streams draining from the Palmer Divide (fig. 1). Re~:ional analysis provides <br />improved estimates of streamflow characteristics for gaged sites by decreasing time-sampling <br />errors of short gage records by substituting space (many gages in a region) for time (short <br />gage record). Predicting the upper limits to the magnitudes of floods in a specific region has <br />been a long standing challenge in flood hydrology. Envelope curves encompassing maximum <br />floods in a relatively homogeneous hydrometeorologic region have long been used in flood <br />hydrology (Crippen and Bue, 1977; Costa, 1987a; Jarrett, 1990). Use of envelope curves for <br />a hydrometeorologic region assumes that the maximum flood in a basin is likely to be <br />experienced in a nearby basin. Not all basins in the region are ex~ ected to have had the <br />maximum flood, but no basin has yet had a flood that exceeds the envelope curve for the specific <br />region. The primary limiting factors for extreme floods are amcunt, intensity, duration, and <br />spatial distribution of rainfall, orographic enhancement of rainfal', and basin slope (Costa, <br />1987b; Pitlick, 1994). Incorporating paleoflood data for various basins in a region provides <br />an opportunity to add a new level of confidence to envelope curves (Enzel and others, 1993; <br />Jarrett and Waythomas, in press; Jarrett, in review a; Jarrett and others, in review). Flood <br />data for Palmer Divide streams (McKee and Doesken, 1997) were compiled to develop envelope <br />curves of peak discharge versus drainage area. <br /> <br />Flood-Frequency Relations <br /> <br />Flood-frequency relations were developed from an analysis of annual peak flows through 1996 <br />for Cherry Creek near Franktown (06712000) and near Melvin (06712500), which is <br />located about 2 miles upstream from Cherry Creek Reservoir (fig. 1). Flood-frequency <br />relations were developed using a Log-Pearson Type III (LPIII) frequency distribution <br />(Interagency Advisory Committee on Water Data, 1981). To help facilitate risk assessments of <br />rare floods (e.g, defining the upper end of frequency curves), pale,oflood data (magnitude and <br />ages) were incorporated into the flood-frequency analysis to extend the gaged record. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />r <br />/I <br />/I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.