Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />, <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-1 <br /> <br />666 <br /> <br />HYDRAUI.IC ENGINEERING '94 <br /> <br />h <br />A :: A + J T dh <br />o h <br />o <br />wIth the initial condition T=To' A=Ao and P=Po for h=q. <br />1 (18) has the only one solution descrlblng the <br />In fact equal on one of constant side slopes above the initial <br />original channel.111-e1, g a small deviation from the depth-dlschar'ge <br />level. However a ow n <br />curve, l.r. replacing equation {14l by <br />G (h) - '(h).G (h) . G (h) <br />2 1 I t an <br />h a:<h) Is the relative error assumed to be small, one ge 5 <br />:p:~~ximate alternative shape whic1h1 can dl[{:~ ~~~~l~~ab~e~r::l~:~ <br />1 i alone In order to show equa <br />o~m:r~callY by the Runge-Kulla fourth order method for varl~US de~th <br />n () The exam les of the approximate alternatl ve 5 apes or <br />step ~h. =0 25 a~d the initial rectangular channel of 2 m wide <br />side s ope Z-. e shown at Fig.2a and the corr!?'spondlng relative <br />and 1 m de:" e:~etrlc factor at Figure 2b. As can be expected the <br />~:~:~l~; :~rorg 6(hl increases both with the length of the dept~ st~r <br />tI d lth the distance from the initial leve. <br />o~a~lom:eut:Ot:dn f~~m ;tgure 2b that the alternative ~>hap'Js show lO~~ <br />~IOW capacity than the original one, which Is in contl.adlclion W h <br />_ 1 In fact the contradiction can be shown in a muc <br />~~:p~:~O~y a~.:~.bY a comparison of the depth-discharge curves above <br />an inItial level tor various side slopes z. <br /> <br />( 19d) <br /> <br />( 140) <br /> <br />h-ho{rn) <br />3.' <br /> <br />h-ho(m) <br />3.r. <br /> <br />.0 <br /> <br /> <br /> 000) T'I- 0- <br />l".: <br />~ ::::: - .0.\ . <br />)!'! - <br />;...- ~ <br />,/...- 01 In) <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />AI (Ill) <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />2.' <br /> <br />.005 <br /> <br />2.5 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />0' l <br /> <br />. 10 O:o-..-o.~']'-I-HI' <br />(b) OG (ll) <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />0.' <br />o <br />o , <br />(0) <br /> <br />2345678 <br />(T-T ,l/2 (m) <br /> <br />figure 2. (a) Example of approxieate alternative shapes <br />d (b) The corresponding relative error of G. <br />CONCLUSI0NS~n Jt Is a warning of application of the Chezy-Manning <br />formula regardless of channel shape. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />A New Formula for Mean Velocity In Torrents <br /> <br />Hanspeler Hodel', Isidor SIocchenegger2 <br /> <br />Abstract <br />In this paper we present a new equation for mean velocity in lomnls based on <br />Iraveltime measurements and geomorphological relations. Here, the emphasis is nol <br />on understanding the physical phenomena of nuid now in torrents, but on the <br />combination of travel time with morphological characterisrics in stream networks. <br />The formula presented can be used for stream velocity as a meaD value or a function <br />of watershed characteristics over long reaches. In further research most progress can <br />be assumed by the skilled combination of fractal concepts with relations based on <br />velocity measUrpuenls in differenl river basins. <br /> <br />I. Background - Basics <br />Many problems concerning the determination of parameters for river basins <br />may be solved with fonnulas, which calculate the velocity with basin characteristics. <br />and discharge. These problems can occur in the following applications: <br />i) time of concentration <br />ii) time lag in pollution control and risk management <br />Hi) nood routing by kinematic waves <br />Such formulas are based on relations like: <br />i) v = f(Q(x).C(x)) velocity <br />ii) A = QIv cross-section area of now <br />iii) IiN/iQ = g(Q(x), C(x)) derivation to gel the time of coocentration (integration) <br /> <br />In general, the streamnow velocity is expressed by the CMzy equation. The <br />application of this fonnula requires quantitative infonnation concerning channel <br />shape, size, roughness, and slope. Using this equation the biggest problem for the <br />practical men is the integration over long, reaches. The amount of data to be <br />collected, processed and analyzed for the correct use of this equalion is enormous. In <br />order to reduce cost. practitioners prefer simple solutions. Different approuches <br />perfonn the requirements under simplified assumptions <br />i) neglect of discharge. roughness, channel shape and size, regard only average <br />.Iope (Kirpich's fonn"la for the time of concentration (Kirpich, 1940}), <br />Ii), reduction of river basin to triangular or paraoolic channel (Aron el al., /99/). <br />iii) reduction of stream network according to geomorphical fractal concepts <br />(Slorchenegger 1984, Aron ., ai, 1990) <br /> <br />ISwis.lI National Hydrological and Geological Survey, CH-300J Berne. Switzerland <br />2Undcnslnissc 23, CH-8307 Errmi1mR. Switzerland <br /> <br />667 <br />