My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06864
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06864
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:11 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:33:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Fremont
Community
Canon City
Basin
Arkansas
Title
FIS - Canon City
Date
5/3/1982
Prepared For
Fremont County
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish the peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for floods of thp selected recurrpnc(' int('r- <br />val s for pach stream studied in detail and to comparl' rpsu1ts lwtwl'pn <br />prev i ous reports for the fl ood i ng sources undl'r s turly here, <br /> <br />A regional relationship of basin area to peak discharge was used for <br />the Arkansas River. Gaging stations located within the upper <br />Arkansas basin were used to establish this regional relationship, <br />The method developed by the U.S. Water Resources Council (Reference <br />4) was used to determine the floodflow-frequency relationship, based <br />on a log-Pearson Type II I oi stribution for each se1 ected gaging <br />station. The annual peak discharges were obtained from U,S, Geo10Q- <br />ica1 Survey Water-Supply Paper Nos. 1681, 1921, and 3721 (References <br />2, 5, and 6, respectively) and from Water Resources Data for Colorado <br />(Reference 7l. Regional relationships of basin area to peak dis- <br />charge were determined for the 10-, 50-. 100-, and 500-year <br />fl oods. <br /> <br />These discharges were then compared to the discharges obtained from <br />the Corps of Engineers' study at Florence, Colorado (Reference 8), <br />The discharges obtained in the regional analysis fell within the 90~, <br />confidence limits of the discharges in the Florence report and there- <br />fore the hydrologic analysis as presented in the Florence Flood Plain <br />Information Report was adopted for use in estimating the flood bound- <br />aries for the Arkansas River. The discharges for the tributaries in <br />Canon City were obtained using the pub1 ication "Procedures for Deter- <br />Mining Peak Flows in Colorado" (Reference 9). Thi s method was used <br />in the Colorado Water Conservation Board report, "Flood Plain <br />Information Re ort for Northeast Canon Draina e," (Reference 10), <br />e y ro OglC ana YS1S ln t e ort east anon Drainage Report was <br />adopted for thi s Flood I nsurance Study. Ra i nfa 11 amounts for Forked <br />Gulch, Sand Creek and Southeast Canon Drainage were obtained from <br />National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Atlas 2, Precipi- <br />tation-Frequency Atlas of the Western United States (Reference 11), <br /> <br />Peak discharges for each flooding source are presented in Table 2. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.