Laserfiche WebLink
<br />It should be noted that for totally dry initial conditions, total porosity minus water <br />content is equal to effective porosity, which is generally about 75 to 97 percent of the total <br />porosity. <br /> <br />7, FIELD MEASUREMENT OF INFILTRATION. <br /> <br />Although many methods can and have been used to measure infiltration rates in <br />the field, a common practice is through the use of a double ring infiltrometer. These <br />consist of concentric cylinders approximately 40 cm high. Diameter of the inner ring is 28- <br />33 cm, while the outer ring is 50-60 cm in diameter. Concentric rings are used, with <br />measurement confin,ild to the inner ring, in order to minimize error due to flow divergence <br />in directions other than the vertical. In the field, the cylinders are driven into the soil <br />surface to approxima.tely 15 cm of depth. Water is filled to a depth of about 1 0 cm in both <br />cylinders and the lime and height of water in the inner cylinder are recorded. <br />Measurements are taken at 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes and each hour for at <br />least four hours. Additional water is added and measured to maintain a relatively constant <br />head. It is important that the water level in the outer cylinder be kept at about the same <br />level as the inner onE! and should never be filled higher that the inner cylinder. Recorded <br />rates of infiltration am computed from the measurements and plotted versus time to define <br />the infiltration curve. From this relationship, parameters for use in the infiltration methods <br />described previously can be determined. <br /> <br />8. FLOOD RECONSITUTION <br /> <br />Reconstituting historic or observed storm events can give the most accurate <br />estimate for infiltration for a basin. If a basin has rainfalVrunoff data from historic storm <br />events, infiltration rates can be determined by "backtracking" from the observed runoff <br />volume, what Infiltration values have to be applied to the observed rainfall hyetograph to <br />match the observed runoff volumes. The example below shows this concept. <br /> <br />A USGS rainfalVstream gage located in the Irondale Gulch Basin in Montebello was used <br />to determine historical infiltration rates during actual flood events in the basin. The gage <br />used in the flood reconstitutions was USGS gage 06714310, titled "Sand Creek Tributary <br />at Denver, CO. which is actually in the Montebello development in Irondale Gulch. The <br />gage was located on the left bank of a concrete lined drainage ditch in the median of <br />Andrews Dr. Parkway, 50 feet downstream of Troy Street. The basin has a 0.30 square <br />mile drainage area, The three largest flood producing events were selected out of the <br />twenty-two storms with available rainfalVrunoff data to determine historic infiltration rates. <br />An iterative process was used to determine what infiltration rate for each storm would <br />result in the simulated volume of runoff that would closest match the historic volume of <br /> <br />Colorado Flood <br />Hydrology Manual <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />7.20 <br />