My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06847
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06847
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:08 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures
Date
7/1/1997
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Design Guideline 6 <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Toskanes <br /> <br />Toskanes are concrete armor units which are used as a replacement for riprap (see Figure <br />6.1). In cases where rock can't be found in suitable sizes, concrete armor units have the <br />advantage that they can be constructed to meet the design size, mass, and number of units <br />required to provide protection. Concrete armor units have been used in coastal applications <br />where very large riprap would be required to resist the impact forces generated by waves. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) contracted with Colorado State <br />University (CSU) in 1992 to investigate a concrete tetrapod as a countermeasure for local <br />scour at bridge piers. The purpose of the research was to develop guidelines for selection <br />and placement of cost-effective tetrapod sizes to mitigate pier scour. A literature review of <br />concrete armor units used in coastal and river protection works led to the selection of the <br />Toskane as the primary concrete armor unit for which guidelines where to be developed. <br />The Toskanes were modified from those used in coastal applications by removing the <br />pointed corners from the hammerheads, increasing the length and cross section of the <br />beam, and including reinforcing steel in the beam. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 6,1 CSU Toskanes <br /> <br />Design Guidelines <br /> <br />Hydraulic tests to evaluate the performance of <br />Toskanes were conducted in an indoor flume and <br />two outdoor flumes at CSU. Over 400 test runs <br />were conducted. These tests included random <br />and pattern placement of Toskanes tested to <br />failure around piers and abutments, determination <br />of protective pad radius, determination of pad <br />height (comparing installations in which the top of <br />the pad was level with the bed and installations in <br />which the pad protruded above the bed), <br />comparison of gravel and geotextile filters, number <br />of Toskanes per unit area, and effect of angle of <br />attack on Toskanes at a round nose pier. The <br />data were analyzed and using dimensional <br />analysis the significant parameters were <br />determined. The following design guidelines <br />reflect the results of the research conducted at <br />CSU (Fotherby and Ruff 1995): <br /> <br />1. Determine the velocity: <br />a. Calculate the average velocity of the river directly upstream of the bridge <br />(approximately 3 m upstream). Consider the number of substructure <br />elements in the flow at the bridge cross section. If constriction could be <br />significant, increase the approach flow velocity accordingly. <br /> <br />6.3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.