My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06847
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06847
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:08 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures
Date
7/1/1997
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />9. The injection sequence should proceed from toe of slope to top of slope, but the mat <br />should be anchored at the top of slope first by pumping grout into the first rows of bags, <br />by allaching the mat to a structure, or using tension anchors (see recommended <br />injection sequence in Figures 5.2 and Figure 5.3). <br /> <br />10. If the mat is to be permanently anchored to a pier or abutment there are implications <br />which must be considered when using this technique. The transfer of moments from the <br />mat to the pier may affect the structural stability of the bridge. When the mat is attached <br />to the pier the increased loadings on the pier must be investigated. <br /> <br />11. Curved edge designs may require communication with the fabric manufacturer on <br />shaping limitations and field adjustments. <br /> <br />12. The need for a geotextile or granular filter should be addressed. Guidelines on the <br />selection, design, and specifications of filter material can be found in Brown and Clyde <br />(HEC-11) (1989) and Holtz et al. (FHWA HI-95-038) (1995). <br /> <br />Figure 5.2 illustrates some of the installation features specified by ODOT on the Salmon <br />Creek Bridge as well as typical design features. Notice that the original ODOT design was <br />modified by the manufacturer due to the limitations of the product. The fabric forms could <br />not be terminated in a smooth fan shaped pallern as shown in the original ODOT design. <br />Therefore, the mat was cut at the seams to best fit the original design. It was anticipated <br />that this would make the system somewhat less effective than the original design because of <br />a greater susceptibility to undermining of the edges. Figures 5.4 and 5.5 show the final <br />installation of the articulating block mat at Salmon Creek Bridge. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 5.3 Installation of articulating block mat proceeding upslope (OOOT) <br /> <br />5.7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.