My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06847
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06847
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:08 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures
Date
7/1/1997
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BRIDGE SCOUR AND STREAM INSTABILITY <br />COUNTERMEASURES <br /> <br />Experience, Selection and Design Guidance <br /> <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Bridge scour and stream instability problems have always threatened the safety of our <br />nation's highways. Countermeasures for these problems are defined as measures <br />incorporated into a highway-stream crossing system to monitor, control, inhibit,' change, <br />delay, or minimize stream instability and bridge scour problems. An action plan for <br />monitoring structures during and/or after flood events can also be considered a <br />countermeasure. <br /> <br />Countermeasures include river stabilizing works over a reach of the river up- and <br />downstream of the crossing. Countermeasures may be installed at the time of highway <br />construction or be retrofitted to resolve stability problems as they develop at existing <br />crossings. <br /> <br />While considerable research has been dedicated to design of countermeasures for scour <br />and stream instability, many countermeasures have evolved through a trial and error <br />process. In addition, some countermeasures have been applied successfully in one locale, <br />state or region, but have failed when installations were attempted under different geomorphic <br />or hydraulic conditions. In many cases, a countermeasure that has been used with success <br />in one state or region is virtually unknown to highway design and maintenance personnel in <br />another state or region. Thus, there is a significant need for information transfer regarding <br />stream instability and bridge scour countermeasure design, installation, and maintenance. <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />This document represents an initial step toward sharing countermeasure experience, <br />selection, and design guidelines among Federal, State, and local highway agency personnel. <br />This information may facilitate the selection and design of countermeasures as State <br />highway agencies (SHAs) develop Plans of Action for bridges identified as scour critical. <br /> <br />2.0 PURPOSE AND SOURCES <br /> <br />The purpose of this document is to identify bridge scour and stream instability counter- <br />measures that have been implemented by various SHAs to protect bridges in the United <br />States. The approach was to supplement information gathered from the SHAs with <br />guidelines reported, primarily, in Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) publications, and <br />to develop a matrix which summarizes countermeasure application and use throughout the <br />United States. In addition, design guidelines are provided for several countermeasures <br />which have been applied successfully on a state or regional basis, but for which only limited <br />design references are available. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.