My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06847
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06847
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:10:08 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures
Date
7/1/1997
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Introduction <br /> <br />Design Guideline 2 <br /> <br />Soil Cement <br /> <br />In areas where high quality rock is scarce, the use of soil cement can provide a practical <br />countermeasure alternative for channel stability and scour protection. Soil cement has been <br />used to construct drop structures and armor embankments, dikes, levees, channels, and <br />coastal shorelines. Soil cement is frequently used in the southwestern United States <br />because the limited supply of rock makes it impractical to use riprap for large channel <br />protection projects. <br /> <br />Design Guidelines <br /> <br />The following design guidelines <br />reflect guidance in information <br />provided by the Pima County <br />Department of Transportation in <br />Tucson, Arizona and the <br />Portland Cement Association. <br />Typically, soil cement is <br />constructed in a stair-step <br />configuration by placing and <br />compacting the soil cement in <br />horizontal layers (see Figure <br />2.1). However, soil cement can <br />be placed parallel to the face of <br />an embankment slope rather <br />than in horizontal layers. This <br />technique is known as plating. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 2.1 Stair step facing on Bonny Reservoir, <br />Colorado after 30 years (PCA). <br /> <br />1. Facing Dimensions for Slope Protection using Stair-Step Method <br /> <br />In stair-step installations soil cement is typically placed in 2.4-m-wide horizontal layers. The <br />width should provide sufficient working area to accommodate equipment. The relationship <br />between the horizontal layer width (W), slope of facing (S), thickness of compacted <br />horizontal layer (v), and minimum facing thickness measured normal to the slope (tn) is <br />quantified by the following equation and is shown graphically in Figure 2.2: <br /> <br />W = tn.JS2 +1 +Sv <br /> <br />(PCA) <br /> <br />As illustrated in Figure 2.3, for a working width of 2.4 m, a side slope of 1V:3H, and <br />individual layers of 150 mm thick, the resulting minimum thickness of facing would be 620 <br />mm measured normal to the slope. Bank stabilization along major rivers in Pima County, <br />Arizona is constructed by using 150 mm lifts of soil cement that are 2.4 m in width and <br />placed on a 1 V: 1 H face slope. <br /> <br />2.3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.