Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />The main problem that is encountered is a high ground-water table. <br />The construction of large-diameter pipelines will be affected. The <br />water will have to be lowered during the construction phase. Also, <br />special trench shoring may be required to prevent sloughing of the <br />trench. <br /> <br />Cost estimates for land acquisitionwereobtained from appraisers <br />working in Alamosa. Prices ranged from $0.50 per square foot to <br />$4.00 per square foot, depending upon location, existing zoning, <br />future land use, and access. No distinction was made at this time <br />between the purchase of fee simple title or the purchase of an ease- <br />ment. The final placement of the project and negotiations with the <br />land owner will determine whether fee simple or easement is best. <br /> <br />Table 4 is a summary of the estimated construction costs for each <br />alternative. The construction costs include a 25-percent contingency <br />factor to allow for construction details not considered in this plan- <br />ning study. The engineering, surveying, inspection, and administra- <br />tion costs are estimated to be 20 percent of construction costs. <br />Costs are considered appropriate for construction occurring in the <br />1982 construction season. For construction in subsequent years, <br />these cost estimates should be appropriately modified. <br /> <br />Table 5 is a list of priorities that are recommended for implementa- <br />tion of the plan presented herein. Where alternatives have been pre- <br />sented, Table 5 presents the recommended alternative. The priorities <br />were selected based upon the type of problem and the results gained <br />by the construction. <br /> <br />-46- <br />