Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Hydrology Report <br />for <br />Winter Park Flood Insurance Study - FEMA <br />by <br />J.F. Sato and Associates <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The Town of Winter Park commissioned a flood study of the <br />Fraser River and several tributaries in 1980. The study was <br />performed by Worrall and Associates, Inc. of Winter Park. It <br />included a detailed hydrology study for the Fraser River Basin. <br />The Worrall analysis used data from eight U.S.G.S. gages <br />(Table 1) to develop flood discharge vs. drainage area curves for <br />several recurrence intervals. Seven of the gages are in the <br />Fraser basin and one is in the nearby Williams Fork basin <br />(Figures 1 and 2). All the gage records are affected by <br />diversions. <br />First, records of Denver Water Board diversion amounts on the <br />dates of peak annual flows were obtained. The diversion flows <br />were added to the U.S.G.S. record peak flows (Figures 3 to 6 and <br />Exhibit 1). These combined flow annual peaks were analyzed <br />according to the log-Pearson Type III procedures described by the <br />Water Resources Council in Bulletin 17. Flood flows for the <br />2-year, 10-year. 50-year, 100-year, and sOO-year recurrence <br />intervals were calculated for all the gages (Figures 7 to 13). <br />These values were then used for the final regression curves <br />(Figure 14). <br /> <br />Snowmelt Peak Flow Analysis <br /> <br />To check the assumption of snowmelt peak flows, the month in <br />which annual peaks have been recorded were summarized (Table 2) <br />and strip charts were examined. <br /> <br />-1- <br />