Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the study sponsors, the boundaries were moved to the shore of the <br />lake farthest from the river channel. Some small areas with ground <br />elevations above the l00-year flood water surface elevation where <br />located within the floodway boundaries. At the request of the study <br />sponsors, these islands were shown as inundated. Where the half-foot <br />and one-foot rise floodways were close together or coincident, only <br />the half-foot floodway boundaries were plotted. In reaches where the <br />floodways were close to or coincident with the 1 00-year flood <br />boundary, only the l00-year flood boundary was plotted. Tables 1 and <br />2 present floodway data for all cross sections for the main channel <br />half-foot and one-foot rise floodways. Tables 3 and 4 give the <br />floodway data for the floodways along LPATH. <br /> <br />RI'FEREKES <br /> <br />1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Ctnaha District, Special Flood <br />Hazard Report, Cache La Poudre River, Fort Collins, Colorado, <br />1989 <br /> <br />2. U.S. Amy Corps of Engineers, Ctnaha District, Hydrologic <br />Analysis of the Cache La Poudre River Basin, April 1988 <br /> <br />3. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, <br />HEC-2 Water Surface PrOfiles, Generalized Computer Program, <br />Davis California, September 1990 <br /> <br />4. Federal Elnergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Study, <br />Larimer County Colorado, March 1987 <br /> <br />13 <br />