My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06691
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06691
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:15:23 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:27:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
44
County
Adams
Arapahoe
Douglas
Community
Denver Metro Region
Stream Name
Lena Gulch
Basin
South Platte
Title
Master Drainage Plan - Lena Gulch Volume I
Date
6/1/1975
Designation Date
7/1/1975
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />VII..8 <br /> <br />6. Solid Waste Disposal. Techniques have been developed and put into <br />practice which combine multiple purpose benefits centered around <br />close-In solid waste disposal sites. In essence, this multiple <br />use involves the construction of excavated storage ponds. The ex- <br />cavated material Is partially used for' sale as pit run sand and <br />gravel with the remainder being used for the covering of solid waste <br />disposal cells. <br /> <br />The advantage of this multiple use is that a community can develop a <br />solid waste disposal site close In to the center of activity at rea- <br />sonable cost because of income derived from sand and gravel sales, <br />reduced costs of drainage and construction downstream, and reduced <br />maintenance costs because sediment and debris are collected in the <br />storage ponds. The sediment and debris can be removed and dis- <br />posed of adjacent to the pond. These ponds also create public <br />health benefits because of the improved stream quality dO~lI1stream <br />f rom the ponds. <br /> <br />A site for this multiple purpose use might range from between 50 and <br />200 acres. The storage pond is constructed be.low ground 'level, <br />similar to a large gravel pit. Adjacent to the pond, a solid waste <br />disposal area is established. MatElrial excavated from the pond site <br />Is either sold as sand and gravel or used to cover the solid wastes, <br />depending upon the quality of the material excavated. It has been <br />proven that such multiple use is practical and unobjectionable, as <br />long as the total operation is well run and well organized. It is <br />possible to have a well run and properly financed solid waste dis- <br />posal site because of the income derived from the sand and gravel <br />sales, the real-location of money saved on drainage programs, and <br />the income from solid waste disposal. <br /> <br />Maintaining a minimum water level would provide aesthetic benefits <br />which would often be suitable for body contact water sports. In <br />addition, a hill would have been constructed adjacent to the pond <br />which might be 1/8 to 1/4 mile in width across the bottom, 100 to <br />150 feet high, and as long as necessary. The hi II Is, of course, <br />available for recreational purposes, Including winter sled and <br />toboggan riding. <br /> <br />The area near the upper detention/sedimentation pond would seem to <br />have the potential for such uses. However, no costs or benefl ts <br />were included in this study for such a scheme. <br /> <br />INTANGIBLE BENEFITS <br /> <br />Natural reSource planning organizations In recent years have begun to <br />recognize the importance of the intangible components of resource uti li- <br />zation. Almost by definition, intangible benefits were, unti'l recently, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.