My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06680
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06680
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:39 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:27:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Flood Damage in the United States, 1926-2000
Date
6/1/2000
Prepared By
NOAA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />42 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. Individual damage estimates for small floods or for local jurisdictions within a larger <br />flood area tend to be extremely inaccurate. <br /> <br />It is rare to have actual cost data to compare with damage estimates. The above analysis <br />of one large flood disaster indicates that, in cases where actual costs are less than $30 million, a <br />large proportion of estimates are off by at least a factor of two and sometimes much more. When <br />damage in a state is estimated to be less than $50 million, estimates from NWS and other sources <br />frequently disagree by more than a factor of two. <br /> <br />3. Damage estimates become more accurate at higher levels of aggregation. Thus NWS <br />estimates totaled over large geographic areas or many years are likely to be fairly reliable <br />(within about a 50% margin of error). <br /> <br />Errors tend to average out, as long as the local estimates are not systematically biased. <br />For example, the sum of estimates from many counties in a large flood area are found to be quite <br />close to the actual total costs for the area as a whole. When damage in a state is estimated to be <br />greater than $500 million, disagreement between estimates from NWS and other sources are <br />relatively small (40% or less). The relatively close agreement between NWS and state estimates <br />in years with major damage is reassuring, since the most costly floods are of greatest concern <br />and make up a large proportion of total flood damage. <br /> <br />4. Floods causing moderate damage are occasionally omitted, or their damage greatly <br />underestimated, in the NWS data sets. <br /> <br />When discrepancies between NWS and state estimates are large, most often the state <br />estimate is the higher one. Occasionally, NWS estimates are missing for floods in which the <br />state claims as much as $50 million damage. Such omissions would have little effect on national <br />total damage estimates. However, they might be important in analyses of damaging floods at the <br />state or river basin level. Researchers studying flood damage in states or river basins should be <br />aware that the NWS estimates occasionally overlook some locally significant damage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.