Laserfiche WebLink
<br />42 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. Individual damage estimates for small floods or for local jurisdictions within a larger <br />flood area tend to be extremely inaccurate. <br /> <br />It is rare to have actual cost data to compare with damage estimates. The above analysis <br />of one large flood disaster indicates that, in cases where actual costs are less than $30 million, a <br />large proportion of estimates are off by at least a factor of two and sometimes much more. When <br />damage in a state is estimated to be less than $50 million, estimates from NWS and other sources <br />frequently disagree by more than a factor of two. <br /> <br />3. Damage estimates become more accurate at higher levels of aggregation. Thus NWS <br />estimates totaled over large geographic areas or many years are likely to be fairly reliable <br />(within about a 50% margin of error). <br /> <br />Errors tend to average out, as long as the local estimates are not systematically biased. <br />For example, the sum of estimates from many counties in a large flood area are found to be quite <br />close to the actual total costs for the area as a whole. When damage in a state is estimated to be <br />greater than $500 million, disagreement between estimates from NWS and other sources are <br />relatively small (40% or less). The relatively close agreement between NWS and state estimates <br />in years with major damage is reassuring, since the most costly floods are of greatest concern <br />and make up a large proportion of total flood damage. <br /> <br />4. Floods causing moderate damage are occasionally omitted, or their damage greatly <br />underestimated, in the NWS data sets. <br /> <br />When discrepancies between NWS and state estimates are large, most often the state <br />estimate is the higher one. Occasionally, NWS estimates are missing for floods in which the <br />state claims as much as $50 million damage. Such omissions would have little effect on national <br />total damage estimates. However, they might be important in analyses of damaging floods at the <br />state or river basin level. Researchers studying flood damage in states or river basins should be <br />aware that the NWS estimates occasionally overlook some locally significant damage. <br />