My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06680
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06680
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:39 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:27:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Flood Damage in the United States, 1926-2000
Date
6/1/2000
Prepared By
NOAA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The basin-level damage estimates are available in spreadsheet form from our website, <br />www.flooddamagedata.org. Estimates are presented by calendar year. The grouping of basins <br />within drainages is somewhat different from that commonly used to define water resources <br />regions (e.g., U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1978 Census of Agriculture) because, over the years, the <br />NWS sometimes changed its groupings. We developed uniform basin definitions for the full <br />time period by using the following organizational system: <br /> <br />(I) Damages are grouped by drainage (e.g, St. Lawrence Drainage, Upper Mississippi, Great <br />Basin) starting in the eastern part of the United States and moving towards the west coast, <br />and then alphabetically by individual or grouped river basin(s). <br />(2) Often, the NWS grouped individual rivers together in annual summaries. For example, <br />damage on the White and Wabash Rivers were usually included together as one estimate. <br />If the published sources of flood data included damage for two river basins together in one <br />year, then data for these two (or more) rivers were added together for all other years. This <br />was the simplest way to produce a coherent data set that could be searched and produce <br />just one row of data for one river basin. <br />(3) In many of the years, damage on unnamed streams was included. If the publication did <br />not give a stream name, damage was included in a row for the drainage called "small <br />streams. " <br />(4) Sometimes the publications would include a river and its small tributaries together, by <br />saying "X River and tributaries." When damage was published in this format, it was <br />entered into the database under the river itself. So, damage listed for some rivers in some <br />years may include not just the river, but its small tributaries (such as creeks). <br />(5) Creeks that were included separately in NWS publications from the rivers to which they <br />are tributaries were entered into the database separately. Creeks can be differentiated from <br />rivers in the database because they are labeled "Cr.,.. whereas rivers are entered with the <br />river name only. An exception to this rule is for rivers with Spanish names, such as the <br />Rio Hondo and Rio Grande. Since users may want to search for "Rio Hondo" rather than <br />"Hondo," "Rio" is included in the database. <br />(6) Users looking for damage information on rivers with branches (such as North Platte, South <br />Platte, and Platte) should look for each of these branches. In some cases, all of the <br />branches of one stream are included together, and in some cases they are not. <br />(7) Several of the streams in the data set cross drainage boundaries. If there is a question <br />about which drainage a stream is in, a user should look in both drainages. <br /> <br />E. Use of the Damage Estimates <br />Users of these data sets should be aware that there is uncertainty in the damage estimates, <br />with a likelihood of large errors in some estimates. Types of inaccuracy are described in Section <br />4, and the magnitude of errors is analyzed in Section 5. In consideration of uncertainty, <br />recommendations regarding appropriate uses of the data are offered in Sections 6 and 7. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.