Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />In 1983, when Congress asked the USACE for annual reports of flood damage suffered, <br />Storm Data was the only available nationwide source of damage estimates, Under contract to <br />US ACE to provide estimates, NWS-HIC compiled the limited information available, In the <br />years that followed, methods of compiling and checking the estimates were established and <br />gradually improved. These estimates are published annually in the U,S, Army Corps of <br />Engineers Annual Flood Damage Report to Congress (US ACE 1983-2001), <br /> <br />In the USACE damage reports from 1983 to 1988, narrative descriptions of floods are quite <br />brief (\12 to % page), Many states have no damage estimate but an asterisk (*) indicates that <br />flooding occurred, The 1984 report explains that the table gives a summation of all major flood <br />events but that damage estimates are unavailable for minor flood events. After 1988, the <br />descriptions of flooding and flood damage are more detailed, Beginning in 1991, the asterisk is <br />no longer used and there are few zero entries in the tables, It appears that considerably more <br />record keeping and analysis has gone into damage reports since 1989, <br /> <br />Table 2-2 lists the types of flood loss reported in each of the above publications, From <br />1933 to 1977, estimates were divided into several categories, separated into property and <br />agricultural damage, compiled by river basin, and presented by calendar year, In 1983, the loss <br />categories, spatial scale, and time period changed, Estimates were summarized by state and <br />fiscal year, In 1993, the distinction between property and agricultural damage was eliminated, <br />Throughout the entire period, estimates focused on direct physical damage, though some data on <br />loss of business and wages were included before 1947, Little is known about the methods used <br />to compile and check the estimates prior to 1980, The published reports themselves show an <br />intent to include all parts of the United States and all types of physical damage, <br /> <br />D. Additional Sources of Flood Damage Estimates <br />To compile and evaluate a continuous time series of damage estimates, we supplemented <br />the NWS estimates with comparable data from other sources, Comparable estimates should <br />represent direct physical damage in significant flood events, Extensive information would be <br />required to fill the 1976-1982 gap in the state and national estimates, In addition, independent <br />estimates or cost information were needed to assess the accuracy of the estimates, Reports from <br />many sources were used to confirm damage estimates and to provide information about specific <br />floods, <br /> <br />Reports by Federal Agencies and Task Forces <br />Several federal agencies prepare reports after severe flood events, in order to study the <br />causes of particular floods and recommend improvements in systems of flood monitoring, <br />warning, or control. Some of these reports include descriptions of earlier floods in the <br />community, and some provide damage estimates, <br /> <br />11 <br />