My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06665
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06665
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:27:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Regional Analyses of Streamflow Characteristics
Date
1/1/1973
Prepared For
USGPO
Prepared By
USDOI
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br /> <br />TECHNIQUES OF WATER.RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS <br /> <br />is a significant basin characteristic in some <br />regional frequency analyses, but if all streams <br />in a region have very similar slopes, the slope <br />characteristic will not be significant, either <br />statistically or practically. <br />The significant variables found in 10 pub. <br />lished regional flood-frequency regressions <br />are shown in table 2, The foul' most common <br />variables are drainage area, main-channel <br />slope, percentage of basin area covered by <br />lakes and swamps, and mean annual precipi- <br />tation, Mean annual runoff appears only once; <br />mean annual precipitation could have been <br />substituted for it because the two are highly <br />related, Only four of the 11 remaining vari. <br />abIes appear more than once, <br />Because of the relatively high intercorre- <br />lation among certain of the so-called inde- <br />pendent variables and because most of these <br />variables are ouly crude indexes of the char- <br />acteristic being described, we may question <br />whether the ones infrequently reported as <br />significant are really so, Ordinarily the first <br />foul' variables in table 2 will reduce the stand- <br />ard error very close to the practical minimum. <br />The regression model previously described <br />was used for each of the 10 analyses referred <br />to in table 2. However, that model is not ade. <br />quate for semiarid regions of large relief. <br />For example, consider a stream which rises <br />in the hig-h mountains and flows onto a plain, <br />The 10-year flood will increase with drainage <br />area to the base of the mountains and from <br />that point on may decrease, or at least not <br />increase at the same rate as in the upper part <br /> <br />of the basin, If channel slope is included in a <br />regression using data from such streams, the <br />computed effect of drainage area will depend <br />to some extent on the way channel slope is <br />defined; the usual definition is not adequate <br />to describe a major break in the channel pro. <br />file, Thus a better model for regional analysis <br />is needed for such regions. <br />It is desirable practice to plot the residuals <br />from a regional regression analysis on a map <br />to check for possible geographical bias. Where <br />a substantial bias is indicated by this test, a <br />"geographical factor" is sometimes intra. <br />duced into the regression equation to com- <br />pensate for the bias, Before doing this, the <br />analyst should realize that a geographical <br />bias does not necessarily indicate that the re- <br />gional relation is inadequate; there may have <br />been much higher flood experience in one part <br />of the region than in another during the pe- <br />riod of record used, If possible one should <br />identify the reasons for the bias and incorpo- <br />rate them in the analysis rather than use a <br />geographic factor, <br />Regardless of the region being studied, the <br />analyst should select his model and the rele- <br />vant variables on the basis of knowledge of <br />the system, leaving little of the selection proc- <br />ess to be defined by the data, Snyder and Stall <br />(1966) support this approach by writing: <br /> <br />The extreme versatility of numerical methods and <br />cornputing machines has sometimes led man into the <br />pitfall of relying solely on these methods and ma- <br />chines. This occurs when an analysis of a set of data <br />is made without reference to past knowledge, under <br /> <br />Variable <br /> <br />Table 2.-lndependenl 'Variables used in 10 regional flood-frequency onl:llyses <br />.1 2 3 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 <br /> <br />Drainage areB__n__n_n___n__u_u___nun_________u_______ x x X x X x x x X X <br />Main-channel slope__________________hh______n________~hn___ X X X X X _n_u__n_h <br />Percentage of basin covered by lakes and swamps____~__hn~n_h_~ x n__ X X ___n___~n_ X X --~~ <br />Mean annual precipitation_n___h_n____~__h____n__nh__h__hnn x ______n__n____ X n__ X X <br /> <br />Mean annual runoff_ __ ____ ____________________~_._______________________________-.---------- x -------~ <br />T~year 24-hour rainfalL__ _ _ __ _ ___ _n_ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ____ __ _ _ ~n_~ n _u_ h__ X __ _ _ X _ _ _~__ _n__ -_ _~ n_ - - - - ~ n - -- <br />Average degrees below freezing in January______h__n______~___h__ x ____nn________n_____n._____u___ <br />Orographic factor _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _n _ ___ _ ___ _ ___ _ _ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _~,_ ~ ~ _ _ - - X - - - _n - _n - ___ - - _. n__ - - - - - n_ - --- -- <br /> <br />ElevatioD_ _ ~ _ __ _ _ __ _ __~_ __._ _ ___ ___ _ ~_ _ _ ~ ______ _ __ _ _ ~_ _ ~ _ _ _ _ ___ ---- x __ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -__ - --- -. - - - - x <br />Number of thunderstorm days____________h_____~n~h___.._un_n___ X x ___u___n_____n__n_______ <br />Main-channellength~u _ ____ u__n_ _ _ _ _ _ ____ n_ _ _ ___ ___ _ ~ ~_ _ n_n__ _ + n - - X ---------- - --- - --- ---- --- - -- <br />Ratio of runoff to precipitationn_____ ____ _ __ ____ _ _n _ _ n_ ___ _ _ _ __ _ __ - _u - ~ x -- - --- - -- - - ---- - -- - --- ~ --- ~- <br /> <br />Mean annual snowfaILn_____ ___n__ _n n___n_ _ n_ _ ___ _ _~__ ________ ____h_ - + X --- --- - -- - - ---- - - -- --- -- <br />Average number of wet days per year _~__ _ __nn_ _ _n_n_ n___ n_nn h__ hn h_~n X ____ nnn - - n - ___h <br />Shape factor __~ ___ _ _ __ _ _ __ _____ ___ _ ____ _~__ __. _ _______ _ ____ ___ ____ - - -- - --- - --- -- --- - x - - - --- - ~ --- --- -- <br />Geographical factor ____nh _ ___ _ _____n____ ~ ___n___ __ _ _ ___n__ _ _n _ _ __ _ ~___ __h __ _ ____ - ---- - x x - --- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.