Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 22 - <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Range site and condition classes were mapped for the watershed <br />by the Area Range Specialist. These classes were converted to hydrologic <br />condition classes with the assistance of the Range Specialist and the <br />Work Unit Conservationist. Hydrologic soil groups and weighted values <br />were determined from data obtained from a soils map prepared by <br />the Soil Conservation Service. Runoff curve numbers were computed for <br />each subwatershed from weighted soil-cover complex data. The curve <br />numbers for floodwater storage range from 72 in the upper portion of <br />the watershed to 82 in the lower part. <br /> <br />,\,~ , <br /> <br />Engineering surveys were made on 121 channel and valley cross <br />sections. These were selected to adequately represent the stream <br />hydraulics and floodplain areas, Three to five cross sections were <br />surveyed per mile of stream channel. <br /> <br /> <br />~\, <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />( <br />~ <br />t <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Hydrographs were developed by using methods described in <br />Engineering Memorandum EWP-l and as described in Part 3.16. National <br />Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Supplement A. <br /> <br />The damaging floods are caused by summer thunderstorms of <br />short duration and high intensity. These thunderstorms are the <br />controlling factor for flood detention storage. Flood detention <br />storage to control runoff varies from 0.52 inches to 0.87 inches <br />and represents a 25-year frequency floodwater volume for class "au <br />structures. Floodwater detention storage to control 1.34 inches <br />of runoff above structure number FP-Pl represents a lOa-year frequency <br />floodwater volume for the class uc" structure. <br /> <br />; ~ <br />~ <br /> <br />The Wilson Method of flood routing was used throughout the project <br />in determining area, by depth increments, that would be inQ~dated <br />by each storm in the evaluation series for the following conditions: <br />(1) present, (2) future with planned land treatment measures installed, <br />(3) future with planned land treatment and structural measures <br />installed. <br /> <br />i <br />k' <br />t' <br /> <br />Sedimentation Investigations <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />l' <br /> <br />Previous records of sediment production in the watershed include <br />suspended load measurements at mainstem gaging stations and several <br />reservoir sedimentation surveys. Measurements of suspended sediment <br />load were made by the U. S. Corps of Engineers over a period of 5 <br />years at the Franktown and Melvin gaging stations. The average <br />sediment load at the Franktown station was 0.155 acre-foot per square <br />mile per year, The average load at the Melvin station was 0.456 <br />acre-foot per square mile per year. <br />