My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06658
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06658
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:36 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:26:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Arapahoe
Community
Littleton
Basin
South Platte
Title
Union Ave Dam Boatshute
Date
9/1/1989
Prepared For
Littleton
Prepared By
BOR
Floodplain - Doc Type
Community File
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />In 1985, the COE (US. Army Corps of Engineers) constructed a dam 300 feet downstream of <br />Union Avenue in Englewood on the South Platte River. The dam serves as a diversion structure <br />for a water supply intake for the city of Englewood and also controls the grade of the South Platte <br />River for flood control. The reinforced concrete dam is 18.5 feet high and has a 3 to I slope on <br />the face of the spillway. The total head drop is 15 feet to the downstream channel. A section <br />through the existing dam is shown on figure I. The energy is dissipated in a hydraulic jump at the <br />base of the spillway. This type of energy dissipator has been used successfully at hundreds of <br />structures throughout the world. However, the reverse roller in the jump can trap a boat or person <br />and is hazardous when a boat goes over the dam. Recreational boating has become rnore popular <br />on the South Platte in recent years (fig. 2); therefore, boater safety has become a primary concern. <br /> <br />The CWCB (Colorado Water Conservation Board) is investigating structural alternatives to improve <br />boater safety at the Union Avenue dam. One alternative is to construct a series of boatchutes, <br />each with a drop of 2 to 4 feet, to handle the entire 15-foot drop. The CWCB selected WWE <br />(Wright Water Engineers, Inc.) to plan the boatchutes at the site. The CWCB also requested <br />assistance on the project from Reclamation (the Bureau of Reclamation). Reclamation agreed to <br />construct a physical model of the boatchute in the Hydraulic Laboratory. Funding for the model <br />study was provided primarily by the Great Plains Region's Assistance to States Program; the CWCS <br />provided partial funding for the work. The testing was divided into three phases: <br /> <br />. Phase A. - Model tests to achieve desired flow patterns for boating at discharges between <br />100 and 1,500 ft'!s. <br /> <br />. Phase B. - Sediment tests to observe deposition and scour patterns as they affect the <br />Englewood water intake structure upstream of Union Avenue dam and deposition and <br />scour patterns in the boatchute 1 pool. <br /> <br />. Phase C. - Floodflow tests up to the 100-year flood of 16,400 ft'!s. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />I. A double-ramp boatchute configuration was developed as a result of the rnodel study. This <br />boatchute configuration eliminates dangerous reverse roller hydraulic jumps (figs. 3-5) and provides <br />boatable waves downstream throughout the entire flow range. Boating safety will be greatly <br />improved by the addition of the proposed features. <br /> <br />I' <br />I <br /> <br />2. Guidelines were developed for designing the boatchutes. These guidelines can also be applied <br />to other sites with head drops between 2 and 3.5 feet. <br /> <br />3. With the present Englewood water intake design, boaters would be drawn into the intake area <br />during sluicing. <br /> <br />4. A solid wall [the same height as the intake wall (elevation 5296.5)] is recommended in front <br />of the primary Englewood intakes to protect boaters and to enhance the present sluicing capacity <br />(fig. 3). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.