My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06619
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06619
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:29 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:24:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
Statewide
Title
Federal Guidelines for Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams
Date
2/1/1986
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />flood probabilities up to about 1 percent. This is because available flood <br /> <br /> <br />records are usually for a short time period and further ~xtrapolations to <br /> <br /> <br />define floods with smaller probabilities are unreliable. Consequently, a <br /> <br /> <br />hydrometeorologic approach is generally employed to define an inflow design <br /> <br /> <br />hydrograph having a rare probability of exceedance and representing a reason- <br /> <br /> <br />able upper limit to expected flooding. <br /> <br />Inflow design hydrographs representing floods of specific or designated <br />frequency, can be developed from peak and volume frequency curves represent- <br />ing specified durations. When streamflow data are available at or near the <br />site, flood peak frequency curves are developed using statistical procedures <br />as outlined in the most recent edition of Hydrology Subcommittee, Interagency <br />Advisory Committee on Water Data Bulletin "Guidelines for Determining Flood <br />Flow Frequency.. When streamflow records are not avail ab le at or near the <br />site, peak discharge and volume frequency curves should be developed from <br />regional studies of stream gaging records for streams in the region. <br /> <br />In some cases, streamflow data may not be available for streams similar to the <br /> <br /> <br />one being evaluated. Consequently, it may be necessary to develop hydrographs <br /> <br /> <br />for specifiC frequencies using rainfall-frequency and rainfall-runoff relation- <br /> <br /> <br />Ships. Methods described in the previous paragraphs are more reliable and <br /> <br /> <br />should be used whenever adequate streamflow data are available. <br /> <br />An inflow design hydrograph developed to define the reasonable upper limit of <br /> <br />expected flooding is called the PMF (probable maximum flood). The PMF is <br /> <br /> <br />developed based upon the postulated occurrence of a storm producing PMP <br /> <br /> <br />(probable maximum precipitation), the maximum depth of precipitation that is <br /> <br /> <br />considered possible over the watershed. The PM? values are presented in a <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.