Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e. Both normal and minimlll1 freeboard requirements should be evaluated <br /> <br /> <br />in determining the elevation of the top of dClll. The resulting <br /> <br /> <br />higher top of dam elevation should be adopted for design. <br /> <br />e Freeboard allowances for wind-wave action should be based upon <br /> <br />the most reliable wind data available that are applicable to <br /> <br /> <br />the site. The significant wave should be the minimum used in <br /> <br /> <br />determining wave runup; and the sum of wind setup and wave runup <br /> <br />should be used for determining requirements for this component of <br /> <br /> <br />freeboard. <br /> <br />Computations of wind-generated wave height, setup, and runup <br />should incorporate selection of a reasonable combined occurrence of <br />pool level, wind velocity, wind direction, and wind durations <br /> <br />based on site-specific studies. <br /> <br />. It is highly unlikely that maximlll1 winds will occur when the <br />reservoir water surface is at its maximum elevation resulting <br />from routing the IDF, because maximum levels generally persist <br />only for relatively short periods of time (a few hours). <br />Consequently, winds selected for computing wave heights should <br />be appropriate for the short period the pool would reside at or <br />near maximum levels. <br /> <br />. Normal pool levels persist for long periods of time. Conse- <br />quently, maximlll1 winds should be used to compute wave heights, <br /> <br />e Freeboard allowance for settlement should be applied to account <br /> <br /> <br />for consolidation of foundation and embankment materials when <br /> <br /> <br />uncertainties exist in computational methods or data used yield <br /> <br /> <br />unreliable values for camber design. Freeboard allowance for <br /> <br /> <br />settlement should not be applied where an accurate determination <br /> <br /> <br />of settlement can be made and is included in the camber, <br /> <br />25 <br />