Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3.1 <br /> <br />III. BASIN CHARACTERISTICS <br /> <br />3.1 General <br /> <br />:<. <br /> <br />Cascade and Portland Creeks drain the rugged volcanic and glaciated <br /> <br /> <br />watersheds east of the town of Ouray. The boundaries of the basins are pre- <br /> <br /> <br />sented in Figure 3.1. Elevations range from 7,685 feet at the, mouth of the <br /> <br />creeks which empty into the Uncompahgre River to the headwaters of the cirques <br /> <br /> <br />at 12,800 feet. The creeks convey runoff from rainfall and snowmelt and also <br /> <br />channelize debris flows and avalanches. The debris flow hazards within these <br /> <br />two watersheds are closely related to the pattern of glacial deposition and <br /> <br />scour and postglacial landsliding of thick glacial material and erodible <br /> <br />volcanics. <br /> <br />'I <br />". <br /> <br />The headwaters of Cascade and Portland Creek watersheds both drain the <br /> <br /> <br />Tertiary San Juan volcanic formation. These rocks are locally faulted and <br /> <br /> <br />fractured and composed of tuff, breccia, andesitic and rhyodacitic flow, <br /> <br />reworked bedded volcanic conglomerates and sandstone. The steeply sloping <br /> <br /> <br />creeks then flow west and drain onto the Uncompahgre flood plain forming large <br /> <br /> <br />debris fans upon which the town of Ouray resides. <br /> <br /> <br />Other than these similarities, the two watershed and associated debris <br /> <br /> <br />flow paths exhibit contrasting characteristics. First, Portland Creek drains <br /> <br /> <br />the Amphitheater which is approximately twice as large an area as the Cascade <br /> <br /> <br />watershed. Portland Creek drains an area of 2.8 square miles while Cascade <br /> <br /> <br />Creek drains an area of 1.3 square miles. The Portland Creek basin's shape is <br /> <br /> <br />more nearly circular as compared to Cascade's long, narrow shape. Much of the <br /> <br /> <br />upper watershed and sediment source of the Amphitheater is more steeply <br /> <br /> <br />sloping. The Portland watershed slopes at 30 to 100% compared to Cascade <br /> <br /> <br />Creek at 30 to 70%. A graph of the two channel profiles is provided in Figure <br /> <br /> <br />3.2. As seen from the graph, the upper reach of Portland is much steeper than <br /> <br /> <br />Cascade. As indicated on the attached map (Figure 3.1), the geologic hazard <br /> <br /> <br />of this area is mapped as "rockfall" compared to parts of the Cascade head- <br /> <br /> <br />waters where "talus slopes" are mapped on the less steep slopes. Although not <br /> <br /> <br />shown on this map, another critical difference is that a majority of the <br /> <br /> <br />Portland watershed below about 9,600 feet is overlain by thick accumulations <br /> <br />of glacial drift and colluvium. This material is mapped as "cst," colluvial <br /> <br /> <br />slopes with a thickness greater than 6 feet. Within Portland Creek itself, <br /> <br /> <br />the colluvial slope and glaci~l drift material is relatively thick, e.g., a <br /> <br /> <br />maximum of about 20 feet thick at point A and 10 feet thick at point B (Figure <br /> <br />, <br />1 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />'i <br /> <br />',...; <br /> <br />3.1) . <br />