Laserfiche WebLink
<br />annual flooding due to very localized intense thunderstorms, <br />sometimes in combination with snowmelt. <br /> <br />2,4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />In an effort to reduce flood damage and flood related maintenance <br />cost, the City of Central City established steps to remove the <br />downtown areas from the Special Flood Hazard Areas. Hydrologic and <br />hydraulic studies were conducted to determine the necessary <br />improvements, Flumes and pipes were placed along the major gulches <br />to convey flows underneath the developed areas. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied by detailed methods in the cODlDunity, <br />standard hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine <br />the flood hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a <br />magni tude which are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the <br />average during any 10-, 50-, 100-, or SOO-year period (recurrence <br />interval) have been selected as having special significance for <br />floodplain management and for flood insurance rates. These events, <br />commonly termed the 10-, 50-, 100-, and SOO-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1 <br />and 0.2 percent chance, respectively, of being equaled or exceeded <br />during any year. Although the recurrence interval represents the long- <br />term, averaRe period between floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods <br />could occur at short intervals or even within the same year, The risk of <br />experiencing a rare flood increases when periods greater than 1 year are <br />considered. For example, the risk of having a flood which equals or <br />exceeds the 100-year flood (1 percent chance of annual exceedence) in <br />any 50-year period is approximately 40 percent (4 in 10); for any <br />90-year period, the risk increases to approximately 60 percent (6 in <br />10). The analyses reported herein reflect flooding potentials based on <br />conditions existing in the cODlDunity at the time of completion of this <br />study, Maps and flood elevations will be amended periodically to <br />reflect future changes, <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for each flooding source studied by <br />detailed methods affecting the cODlDunity, <br /> <br />The U,S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) HEC-l computer model was <br />used to determine peak discharges for Gregory Gulch and Eureka <br />Gulch (Reference 1), Peak discharge-drainage area relationships <br />for each flooding source studied in detail are shown in Table 2. <br /> <br />3.2 Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of flooding <br />sources studied were carried out to provide estimates <br />elevations of floods of the selected recurrence intervals. <br /> <br />from <br />of <br /> <br />the <br />the <br /> <br />4 <br />