My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06593
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:25 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:23:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Community
Loveland
Stream Name
Big Thompson River
Basin
South Platte
Title
Floodplain Information Report
Date
12/1/1971
Prepared For
Loveland
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />;\ <br /> <br />tributaries. The Standard Project Flood for the Big Thompson River <br />at Loveland is 44,000 c.f.s. <br /> <br />Hazards of Great Floods <br />The effects of the Intermediate Regional and Standard <br />Project Floods were analyzed to determine the flood potential for the <br />Big Thompson River at Loveland. The analysis was made using bridge <br />and val ley cross sections which were surveyed in February 1970. The <br />water surface profiles were determined using backwater computations <br />employing the Standard Step Method. The head losses at the bridges <br />were computed us I ng data In "Hydrau I ics of Br i dge Waterways" pub I i shed <br />by the U. S. Department of Commerce. WeTr and submerged weir fiow <br />formulas were used with the above whenever water overtopped any por- <br />tion of the roadway. The extent of flooding is shown on the "Flooded <br />Areas" plates. Flood out lines were produced by match i ng flood he i ghts <br />with corresponding elevations at the surveyed cross sections and on <br />U. S. Geological Survey 7 1/2 minute quadrangle maps. These outlines <br />are reasonable rather than precise. For any specific situation, where <br />accuracy is needed, it will be necessary to take the appropriate flood <br />elevations from the profiles or reference date and locate by survey <br />its corresponding elevation.on the flood plain. <br />The Intermediate Regional and Standard Project Flood water <br />surface profi les are shown on the "Prof i Ie" plates which follow the <br />"Flooded Areas" plates. The prof i les show the depths of flooding in <br />the channel, and the water surface elevations to relate the floods to <br />features on the flood plain. <br /> <br />The "Cross Section" plaTes follow the "Prof i Ie" plates. <br /> <br /> <br />The cross seCTions show the nature of flooding across. the valleys. <br /> <br /> <br />Reference points are listed in Table 2 to pinpoint flood <br /> <br /> <br />elevations aT intervals along the stream, The reference points are <br /> <br /> <br />shown on the plan and profile plates and coincide with the location <br /> <br />of the cross sections which were used to make the study. The tables <br /> <br /> <br />include data for reference points - the stream bed belevation,the <br /> <br /> <br />elevations of the Standard Project and Intermediate Regional Floods, <br /> <br /> <br />the bearing of the cross sections and special identification info~a- <br /> <br /> <br />tion where needed. <br /> <br />This study shows that broad areas of the Big Thompson <br /> <br /> <br />plain would be InundaTed by a large flood. During an <br /> <br />Reg i ana I Flood depths of 3 feet w j II be common on The <br /> <br /> <br />Overbank velocities wi I I typically range from 1.5 to <br /> <br />second. Overbank velocities around localized obstruc- <br /> <br />River flood <br /> <br />Greater Floods <br />.F1oods even larger than The STandard Project Flood are <br />possible, but The combination of factors to produce such floods would <br />be eXTremely rare. Such floods are not further discussed in this <br />reporT, although they should not be overlooked where absolUTe safety <br />from flooding is a requirement. <br /> <br />I ntermed I ate <br /> <br />flood plain, <br />3.5 feet per <br /> <br />~ <br />i <br />! <br /> <br />tions such as buildings or over roadways wi I I often exceed 6 feet <br />per second. Erosion wil I continue to be a major source of future <br />flood damage. <br />The flood potent I a I descr i bed i n th I s report wi I I be <br />only a reminder TO the people who wiTnessed the 1951 flood. To tho <br />many people who did not experience the 1951 flood, this.report should <br />create a respeCT for the awesome power of the flooding river, <br /> <br />[ <br />f <br />,. <br />L <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.