Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Nick Ioannides <br />Apri 1 24, 1986 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />3. The Oxford Avenue boat chute can be rehabi 1 itated without a major ef- <br />fort using the rock delivered to the site by Wright Water Engineers, <br />concrete grout, and careful on-site hydraul ic engineering control. <br /> <br />Due to the high-flow releases from Chatfield Reservoir and as a result of <br />our discussions with the U.S.A.C.E., Wright Water Engineers selected an al- <br />ternative location for its Prototype Analysis work. <br /> <br />This alternative location was selected because stream flow was adequately <br />controlled, and the location provided for a study of the important "drop <br />chute" configuration with field analysis of the action of deflectors which <br />could be studied in detail under a range of flows of up to 180 cfs. <br /> <br />The alternative site is in Boulder, Colorado, <br />Street on the University of Colorado campus. <br />described below: <br /> <br />on Boul der Creek at 19th <br />The Prototype An a 1 ys i s is <br /> <br />Prototype Alternative Location and General Information: <br /> <br />Boulder Creek flows in a generally easterly direction from the mouth of <br />Boulder Canyon through the City of Boulder. Nineteenth Street dead-ends at <br />a small foot bridge over Boulder Creek approximately 1.5 miles east of the <br />canyon mouth, located within the University of Colorado campus. At this <br />loc~tion, a large, concrete-encased sewer line crosses the creek. The con- <br />crete encasement protrudes approximately four feet into the channel section. <br />Over time, the flow of the creek over the face of the encasement scoured a <br />deep (four- to five-foot) hole at the downstream base of the crossing (see <br />Figure 1). This created a dangerous "hydraulic" for creek users, particu- <br />larly inner-tubers, who v,()uld go over the concrete face and might be trapped <br />in the "hole" at the bottom. The action of the water was also undermining <br />the concrete encasement, which v,()uld lead to eventual failure of the sewer <br />crossing. (See Photo 1.) <br /> <br />Prototype Description <br /> <br />Due to several simil ar design problems and parameters this drop has to the <br />proposed chutes on the South Pl atte River, this location was picked for pro- <br />totype study for the Columbine Valley \'o\:irs. The v,()rk was pl anned and coor- <br />dinated with the City of Boulder and scheduled to fit in with the City con- <br />tractor's pl ans. The design team met several times to discuss the design to <br />be tested. A ch ute wi th "offset defl ectors" was selected. The fo 11 owi ng <br />work was then accompl i shed under the guidance of the design team members. <br /> <br />1. The deep scour hole at the base of the sewer encasement was fi 11 ed <br />with large, solid stone (two to three feet in diameter). Enough <br />stone was delivered to the site to fill the hole, to have a sloping <br />face from the top of the encasement, and to construct deflectors <br />along the edges of the channel. . <br />