Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />a.. <br /><( <br />0:: <br />CJ$ <br />~<C <br />o~ <br />...J<C <br />LL~ <br />O::<C <br />ffi >- ~ <br />W I <C <br />~O a: <br />~LO 0 <br />en <br />0::> <br />W'- <br />>Q. <br />a:~ <br /><([[ <br />a.. <br />~ <br />>!: <br /> <br />, l<: <br /> II: <br /> <C <br /> 0- <br /> W <br /> "'- ..,...- C!l <br /> 0 <br /> 9 <br /> \ II: <br /> W <br /> W <br /> 0 <br /> ~ <br /> \ <br /> - - <br /> -' <br /> \~ -' <br /> W <br /> llJ <br /> ~ <br /> :; <br /> ." <br /> *~ C!l <br /> <( <br /> II: <br /> () <br /> - <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />T- <br /> <br />(8.:18) M01.:l <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o~ <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />T- <br /> <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />o <br />T- <br /> <br /> ill <br /> (!:) <br /> <( <br /> (!:) <br /> (f) <br /> (!:) <br /> (f) <br /> => <br /> ~ <br />-. <br />:2 ..... <br />0 z <br />- <br />(f) 0 <br />'-" a.. <br /><( () <br />ill <br />a: .....J <br /><( <( <br />() <br />ill <br />(!:) . <br /><( <br />z <br /><( ..... <br />a: z <br />0 - <br />0 <br /> a.. <br /> <( <br /> :2 <br /> ill <br /> LL <br /> X <br /> <br />Based on these standards, there were 15 separate stream reaches classified for a total of 57 river <br />miles. That is an average of 3.8 miles per reach. These 15 stream reaches are listed in Table <br />4 :L.-:d they are shmvn on Figure 6. <br /> <br />4.0 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />4.1 Base Manning <br /> <br />Base mapping selected for the delineation of the 50-year and 100-year floodplains on the Yampa <br />River consisted of7.5 minute U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle maps. A total of 14 quadrangle <br />maps were used in compiling the base maps for the Yampa River study reach. The contour <br />interval for the maps was either 20 or 40 feet (see Figure B). Due to the small scale of the base <br />maps (1 "=2000'), the 50-year and 100-year floodplain boundaries could not be shown as separate <br />in most cases. <br /> <br />4.2 Stream Reaches <br /> <br />Preliminary work on the floodplain mapping of the Yampa River included dividing the entire <br />study into separate reaches. The reaches were classified by estimating stream floodplain widths. <br />The width classifications were refIned once cross-sections were plotted. The width classifications <br />selected are based on the distance from one side of the river to the other at a ground elevation <br />15 feet above the low water level. Those classifications are: <br /> <br />Broad <br />Medium <br />Narrow <br />Canyon <br /> <br />>0.5 mile wide; <br />0.2 - 0.5 mile wide; <br />0.1 - 0.2 mile wide; <br /><0.1 mile wide. <br /> <br />..... <br />- <br />LL <br />ill <br />> <br />a: <br />=> <br />() <br /> <br />14 <br />