My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06541
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06541
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:16 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:22:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Garfield
Community
Carbondale, Marble
Stream Name
Crystal River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Marble Community File
Date
1/1/2001
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Community File
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Leer 0 <br />Colorado Geological Survey <br />December 8, 1972 <br /> <br />our observation over the last three years and based on the flows that occurred <br />during that period and the probabilities listed above, we have bracketed the <br />storm frequency at a 2-5 year occurrence. From the hydrologic analysis similar <br />to that shown in Exhibit No.1, the minimum water content was approximately 80% <br />assuming the storm has a 2-year frequency. This, of course, is a rough esti- <br />mate as the basic data is crude, and the hydrologic rational is based on simpli- <br />fied assumptions. <br /> <br />Of additional concern was the gradient of Slate Creek. Again referring to Dr. <br />Robinson's letter, it is believed that erosion has been "accelerated by the <br />diversion of Slate Creek and the increase of gradient". The grade of Slate <br />Creek before diversion was approximately 9 per cent. It has been documented by <br />Yearke that a relocated channel should be designed so as to preserve the pre- <br />existing hydraulic gradient. As a result of the diversion, the grade of Slate <br />Creek is still 14% in many reaches; and the channel is continuing to seek its <br />hydraulic gradient through erosion and scour. Ferrell (1959) recommends a <br />stabilizing slope of 0.7 of the natural gradient of the area. Consequently, we <br />have used an 8% grade as the stabilizing slope, which is also less than the pre- <br />existing hydraulic gradient. <br /> <br />Grade reduction will be accomplished by the installation of check dams. Silting <br />will occur behind the dams, thus reducing the slope to 8 per cent. The spacing <br />between drops then depends upon the existing grade; i.e., the spacing will be <br />such than an 8% grade will exist from the toe of the above dam to the crest of the <br />ne< dC\'i11stream dam, as shown in Exhibit No.1. Downstream toe and bank protec- <br />tion will a1sooe necessary to minimize potential failure of the dam or of the <br />adjacent banks. <br /> <br />Single and twin prestressed tees will be utilized for the check dams. The single <br />tees will be cut as shown in Exhibit No.1, to carry the 25-year frequency storm. <br />Storms of greater intensity will spill onto the flood plain channel. <br /> <br />The flood plain channel was designed to carry the estimated 100-year fluid de- <br />bris, assuming that the main channel would be filled with mud and rock, as shown <br />in Exhibit No.2. Again, the total flow was determined by assuming that the 100- <br />year storm water discharge represents 40% of the total debris flowage. The grad- <br />iel~t of the flood plain channel will be held at the natural ground grade along <br />Slate Creek, which averages 13.5%. Assuming the total flow (3000 cfs) contains <br />no mud and rock, then the average velocity is 27 fps and the depth of flow is <br />only 2~-feet. However, we know from the Wrightwood Report that the velocity of <br />a debris flowage is much less than of water due to greater bulk density. The <br />average velocity reported was about 10 fps. On this basis, the depth of flow <br />would then be 6.2 feet for a mud type flow. <br /> <br />In addition to the aforementioned channel treatment, Slate Creek must also be <br />channelized from a point above Crystalline Drive (located in Filing No.2), to a <br />point south of the existing county road. In this area, flood waters spread out <br />onto a relatively flat fan and deposit their sediment load. Therefore, we feel <br />that the same criteria applies except that a channel, as shown in Exhibit No.3, <br />ffiJSt be excavated to carry the total debris flow. The minimum freeboard will <br />be held at 5 feet, especially at the crest of drop structures. Again, we assumed <br />that the average velocity for mud flowage was 10 fps and calculated the depth of <br />flow. <br /> <br />KETCHUM . KONKEL . BARRETT . NICKEL . AUSTIN <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.