My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06537
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06537
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:15 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:21:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
116
County
Weld
Community
Nunn
Basin
South Platte
Title
FIS - Nunn
Date
8/1/1978
Designation Date
11/1/1978
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />was plotted on an aerial photograph (Reference 5) of the Town of <br />Nunn. The flood flows eroded the road embankment extensively around <br />the concrete culvert under 4th street and caused minor basement <br />flooding. <br /> <br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />No flood protection structures either exist or are proposed which <br />would reduce the flood hazards in the Town of Nunn. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For flooding sources studied in detail in the community, standard hydro- <br />logic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Floods having recurrence intervals <br />of 10, 50, 100, and 500 years have been selected as having special <br />significance for flood plain management and for flood insurance premium <br />rates. The analyses reported here reflect current conditions in the <br />watersheds of the flooding sources. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish the peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for floods of the selected recurrence <br />intervals for each stream studied in detail in the community. <br /> <br />No streamflow gages are located on Spring Creek Tributary. A <br />search of records of existing gaged streams in Colorado indicated <br />that there were no basins of similar size and physiographic charac- <br />teristics or with recorded rainfall distributions from which compari- <br />sons could be made for a model of the basin hydrology. Therefore, <br />synthetic hyrograph analysis was used to develop storm discharges <br />within the study area. <br /> <br />Rainfall data and distribution used in the development of peak <br />discharges for Spring Creek Tributary (both east and west flow <br />paths) were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric <br />Administration's atlas for Colorado (Reference 6). The data was <br />rearranged following the criteria established in the Urban Storm <br />Drainage Criteria Manual (Reference 7), which is characteristic of <br />Colorado storms in the eastern portion of the State. The U.S. Soil <br />Conservation Service Method, as described in the National Enqineerinq <br />Handbook (Reference 8), was selected as the method which would best <br />represent the runoff characteristics of the Spring Creek Tributary <br />basin. Weighted average curve numbers were computed using soil and <br />land use maps for Weld County (Reference 9). The time of concentra- <br />tion was determined using stream hydraulics of approximate cross <br />sections taken from U.S. Geological Survey topographic maps (Refer- <br />ence 10). Discharges were computed for the 10- and lOa-year flood <br />events and plotted on log-probability paper. The 50- and SOO-year <br />discharges were obtained by straight-line extrapolation of the 10- <br />and lOa-year values. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.