Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Methods For Controlling Erosion <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Dikes - Dikes are useful for bank protection where the water depth adjacent to the bank <br />is greater than four feet, and the stream velocity is too high for other techniques. There <br />are two t) pes of dikes, permeable and impermeable. Permeable dikes allow water and <br />sediment to flow through with reduced velocity while impermeable dikes are used to <br />reduce ri"er width. While both types of dikes are constructed perpendicular to the <br />stream ba 11<, permeable dikes uses timber piles as the main ingredient for construction <br />while iffi'Jermeable dikes use stone. Permeable dikes design criteria depends on <br />sediment load and most have horizontal bracing throughout the structure. Factors that <br />affect the design of the impermeable dikes are severity of expected flows, method of <br />constructiJn, and maintenance requirements. Regardless of the type of dike used the <br />design length of the structure should be at least one-third the length of the desired <br />protection. Since eroding banldine can be great in length, multiple dikes will be needed <br />to produce, the desired effecl. A typical dike is illustrated in Figure 4 - 14. <br /> <br />Dikes WI also be useful in a variety of rivers ranging from high or low gradient <br />tributaries and secondary alluvial streams. Also, permeable dikes require flows with <br />high sedinentloads and impermeable do not require a high concentration of sediment to <br />protect th: banldine. Dikes become more economical than riprap as the depth of the <br />water increases, but, it is safer to use a continuous form of bank protection on bank <br />curves gnoater than thirty degrees. Dikes produce deep and narrow stream channel but <br />becomes ineffective when overtoPped with high water. In 1988, permeable dikes <br />construction costs for a "typical" project in the midwest were $75 per linear foot of <br />banldine. Costs for a similar project using impermeable were $170. No maintenance <br />costs vary greatly due to the dynamics of the situation. Maintenance costs for permeable <br />dikes depend on the use of treated or untreated timber piles. Consult the appropriate <br />section in the state Highway Specifications for minimum requirements for timber piles. <br /> <br />FIGURE 4.14 <br /> <br />Dike <br /> <br />Lash Brosh To <br />Post and Cables <br /> <br /> <br />3Q.60' <br /> <br />Deadman ~ <br /> <br />1\\ <br />111\ \ <br />1111\' <br />1111\\ <br />I I II \ \ <br />V V \l <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />V <br /> <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />V <br /> <br />" <br />I, <br />" <br />" <br />, I <br />V <br /> <br />Rock Depth 4-6' Typical <br /> <br />Fence Dii<es . Fence dikes are very similar in design to hardpoints and jetties. The <br />difference lies in the materials used. Pence dikes consist of wood planks or wire mesh <br />attached 10 timber piles extending riverward of the erocling bank. Slone is often used as <br />a foundat lon, or is placed at the end of the structure to reduce scour. When wire mesh is . <br />used, it is typically backfilled with another material such as brush or hay. The impact to <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br />Colorado Erosion Control Manual <br />