Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~23~ <br /> <br />bridge with a larger bridge is to gr~de the north bridge approach <br />lower to allow overflow at a lower flood elevation. <br />The erratic flooding at the confluence of Gore and Black Gore <br />Creeks is due to poorly defined, unpredictable channel location. A <br />very higl1 discharge could "choose" an alignment anywhere within the <br />shown flood plains with probable high velocities. <br />Photographs of other minor flooding points are also included. <br />Figure IV~l shows a utility line along the bridge at Section 3 which <br />could be damaged during a storm. There are several other utility lines, <br />both sewer and water, crossing Gore Creek which may possibly be damaged. <br />Figure IV~ll shows the shallow flooding at the starter house of the <br />Town of Vail Golf Course. Shallow depths and slow velocities are <br />typical of flooding in the golf course. Plate25,Section49.4.1, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />shows a Golf Course section. <br /> <br />Although the extent of flooding is very important, the velocity <br />distribution within the flooded area and the duration of flooding are <br />very important in describing the hazards and potential damage. <br />Water velocities in the main channel of Gore Creek vary from five <br />to fifteen feet per second. Away from the main channel in the overbank <br />areas, depths are shallow and the velocities will be one to four feet <br /> <br />per second. While the overbank flooding velocities may present a <br />serious hazard to persons, they are usually not so high as to cause <br />significant structural damage to the shallowly flooded building nor <br /> <br />.i <br /> <br />extensive erosion in the meadows. However, the main channel velocities <br />will result in erosion and transportation of sediment. including <br />boulders weighing hundreds of pounds. <br /> <br />"'i <br />,:," <br /> <br />.c, <br /> <br />~24- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The results of the sediment (up to boulders) and debris transport <br />can be undermined foundations, structural collapse or damage and <br />deposition of thick layers of boulders, gravels, sands and silts <br />in areas where slower velocities exist (such as the meadows). <br />The duration of the flooding is especially important where erosion <br />occurs. These erosive forces may cause the relocation of the main <br />channel during floods, especially at curves and oxbows in the meandering <br />portions of the creek. For this reason, a 100 year flooded area map <br /> <br />for Gore Creek may represent a different level of hazard to properties <br /> <br />near and within its limits than would a similar map for a slow-moving <br />stream or river. Examination of properties for flood hazard should <br />include both a comparison of the site elevations with the 100 year <br />flood elevation and the susceptibility of the property to erosion or <br /> <br />deposition. <br /> <br />Debris <br /> <br />The flooding in many areas extends into the wooded areas of the <br />meadows and streamsides. The results are that any floatable or erodable <br />debris may be picked up and carried downstream. In addition to this <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />natural debris, the smaller bridges which may be washed out during <br />these floods present a significant hazard to downstream bridges. The <br />bridge debris may restrict not only water passage efficiency of any <br />downstream bridges, but may also act as a battering ram to collapse <br />or weaken these other bridges. Consequently, any fragile bridges or <br />large potential debris in the upstre~rn reaches constituteS a re,atively <br />significant hazard to e~ch structure below it. <br /> <br />-." <br />