Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />fea~tDi1ity study considered three alternatives for a flood control project. <br />Each alternative w.ou1d provide a h.igh 1eye1 of flood protection for the town. <br />By implementing the first and second alternatives presented in this report, <br />virtually all of the communi'ty would suffer only minimal damage from a flood <br />of the magnitude experienced on July 3D, 1989. Alternative 3 is a scaled-back <br />version of Alternative 2. Destgn flaws are based on a flood of lesser magnitude <br />than tha t experienced in 1989.. <br /> <br />Existing'F1ood Patentia1 <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board summarized three flood parameters <br />ass:ociated with existtngf100d potential as follows: <br />1. Mai.n Channel Flooding - At County Road 19, the flooded areas were <br />contained in the natural floodplain. <br />2. Split Flow' for Flooded Areas - The U.S. Highway 6 and Burlington <br />Northern embankments acted as a diversion dike within the Narth <br />Fork Frenchman Creek f10adp1ain. During the July 1989 flood the <br />diversion of f10adwaters from the natural drainage <br />was substantial. At the U.S. Highway 6 bridge, it has been <br />estimated that seventy percent .of the floodwaters were diverted to <br />the east thrQugh the Tawn of Paoli. These floodwaters were diverted <br />to South Fork Frenchman Creek basin downstream .of Paoli. The path <br />of the diverted floodwaters is shown on figure 1, <br />3. Bridge Conveyance - The capacities .of the U.S. l:li.ghway 6 and <br />Burlington Northern Rai.1road bridges''iJre limited. These limitations <br />are contriouted to by a lack of channel capacity upstream of the <br />b,ridges; reduced bridge openings; and non-existent natural overbank <br />f100dp1atn areas. <br />The parameters above were quantified by field control surveys and a <br />hydraulic analysis as discussed below and in the Technical Appendix. <br /> <br />Field Control Surveys <br /> <br />The field control surveys included the following elements; <br />a) Acquisition of recent aerial phot09raphy and base map(s) from the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board. <br />b) Establishment of a base survey line for the center line .of the existing <br />