My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06490
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06490
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:09:08 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:18:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
533
County
San Miguel
Community
Norwood
Basin
Gunnison
Title
CWCB Floodplain Study Review - FHBM - Norwood
Date
11/1/1974
Designation Date
11/20/2000
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> CWCB FLOODPLAIN STUDY REVIEW <br /> Res. No. Q::l-S33 <br />Hydraulics: <br />Item Note <br />No. Item yeS No N/A No: <br />HC-l Is the hydraulics method applicable to the channel? 0 0 )1 J.i).. <br />HC-2 Is the hydraulics method properly applied? 0 0 )l! <br />HC-3 Are the hydraulics input parameters generally correct? 0 0 Jll <br />HC-4 Is the roughness coefficient applicable for the channel at <br /> the time of the study? 0 0 ~ <br />HC-5 Is the roughness coefficient applicable for the current <br /> channel? 0 0 )l!I: <br />HC-6 Are there backwater effects on the floodplain that are not <br /> addressed in the hydraulics calculations? 0 0 )ll <br />HC-7 Are there potential split flows upstream that may inundate <br /> more/different area than shown on the map? Jll 0 0 (-1.) <br />HC-8 Are there potential backwater affects downstream that <br /> may inundate more/different area than shown on the map? Ji 0 0 .M <br />HC-9 Is there evidence that the channel alignment has shifted <br /> since the study was perfonned? 0 )it 0 <br />HC-lO Have river cross-sections been graphically plotted? 0 p:. 0 <br />HC-ll Have water surface profiles been graphically plotted? 0 )& 0 <br />HC-l2 Does hydraulic infonnation for approximate streams meet <br /> requirements of rule 6.C? )'{ 0 0 ~ <br />HC-13 Does hydraulic infonnation for detailed streams meet <br /> requirements of rule 5.C? 0 0 ]3: <br /> <br />Comments: <br />Note <br />No. <br />(\) <br /> <br />(2.) <br /> <br />(~") <br /> <br />-l':U- <br /> <br />Note <br />No I-l-'r'DI2I4t!uC-l. CAl..<:L"..A.110~t {,.)1:tJ..E' ~~l-~ AS PAf2.:T <br />of 11-1& FI-lP,H. <br />F.:ol.,> .<. '...,Fl..O"....eFt<. A'I /)~I...,Abe I)AT1-t5. ()P$~"'"AM. ~Nh <br />IN ..-He To........,. <br />~IQL.c;. caA(.j.C.........~ fej:&:'"~TS. FI20M T\o\e' C.OL\.lENLT' U/IoJf:) E"1L <br />THe I4lul-\wA'I. <br />NO"""JA<' bE!p,..... ("-">Lc.u LAT'\oN,5 Pee.Fol2.n"lF.'C> 1"",(2. Eb :TI5E 'brzA,J) <br />C;Ul>......... b.......... AS P"'l2:r OF' FII2., <br /> <br />CWCB_checkIiSl.doc <br /> <br />Page 5 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.