Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />'. <br />. <br />I <br />:. <br />I <br />. <br />'I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 7 - Flow Comparison <br />Page 4 <br /> Drainage Area Q10 Q50 Q100 Q500 <br />Stream (Sq. Mi.) <br />RIDlON II <br />Naturita <br />San Miguel River at Naturita 1,080.0 <br /> Method 1 6,350 9,300 11,100 15,200 <br /> Method 2 6,280 9,520 11,000 14,600 <br /> Method 3 6,330 9,325 <br />Tributary I to San Miguel River <br />(approximate study, area too small <br />for Method 1) 1.25 <br /> Method 2 121 <br /> Method 3 (area too small) <br /> Method 4 117 215 244 295 <br />Montrose County (Uravan) <br />San Miguel River at Uravan 1,550.0 <br /> Method 1 7,000 10,200 12,500 17,200 <br /> Method 2 8,120 12,300 14,220 18,870 <br /> Method 3 7,050 10,390 <br />Hiero,lyphiCS Canyon (approximate <br />study 8.4 <br /> Method 1 440 <br /> Method 2 470 <br /> Method 3 <br /> <br />-36- <br />