My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06431
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06431
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:59 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:16:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Estimating Design-Flood Discharches for Streams in Iowa Using Drainage-Basin and Channel-Geometry Characteristics
Date
1/1/1993
Prepared For
Iowa City
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ungaged streams in Iowa because most such <br />stream sites in the State have no flood data <br />available, particularly sites on smaller streams. <br /> <br />Flood runoff is a function of many <br />interrelated factors that include, but are not <br />limited to climate, soils, land use, and the <br />physiography of drainage basins. Previous <br />investigations for Iowa (Schwob, 1953, 1966; <br />Lara, 1973, 1987) have been limited to the types <br />of basin characteristics that can be investigated <br />as potential explanatory val"iables for the <br />development of multiple-regression flood- <br />estimation equations because many of the <br />flood-runoff factors are difficult to measure. <br />Previous investigations defined hydrologic <br />regions to account for factors affecting flood <br />runoff that were difficult to measure directly. <br />The hydrologic regions were delineated on the <br />basis of physiographic differences of broad <br />geographic landform regions. However, two <br />major limitations are encountered when using <br />the hydrologic-region method to estimate flood <br />discharges for ungaged sites. First, it is difficult <br />to weight flood estimates for drainage basins <br />located in more than one hydrologic region or <br />located near the boundaries of hydrologic <br />regions because the boundaries are not well <br />defined. Regional boundaries are tran6itional <br />zones where the physiographic characteristics of <br />one hydrologic region gradua.lly merge into <br />another. Second, because large hydrologic <br />regions may contain drainage basins with <br />physiographies that are anomalous to the region <br />in which they are located, it is difficult to <br />correlate their physiographic differences to <br />another hydrologic region, or to weight their <br />flood estimates. Quantitative measurements of <br />basin morphology to determine appropriate <br />regional equations for drainage basins are not <br />applicable for resolving the6e regional <br />limitations. As a result, flood estimates for some <br />ungaged sites become very subj.ective. <br /> <br />To address the need to minimize the <br />subjectivity encountered in applying regional <br />flood-estimation methods, a study using two <br />different flood-estimation methods was made by <br />the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with <br />the Iowa Highway Research Board and the <br />Highway Division of the Iowa Department of <br />Transportation. Two new flood-estimation <br />methods for Iowa, which are presumed to be <br />independent from each other, were used in this <br /> <br />study. An advantage in developing flood- <br />frequency equations using two independent <br />flood-estimation methods is that each method <br />can be used to verify the results of the other, and <br />the estimates obtained from each method can be <br />used to calculate a weighted average. <br /> <br />Methods are now available to more easily <br />quantify 6elected morphologic and climatic <br />characteristics for a large number of drainage <br />basins. A geographic-information-6ystem (GIS) <br />procedure developed by the U.S. Geological <br />Survey uses topographic maps and digital <br />cartographic data to quantify several basin <br />characteristics that typically were not <br />quantified previously. This GIS procedure <br />expand6 the capability to relate drainage-basin <br />characteristics to the magnitude and frequency <br />of floods for stream sites in Iowa and provides a <br />flood-estimation method that is independent of <br />hydrologic regionalization. <br /> <br />Measurements of channel-geometry <br />characteristics have been used to estimate the <br />magnitude and frequency of floods in <br />investigations conducted by Fields (1975), <br />Webber and Roberts (1981), Parrett and others <br />(1987), Hedman and Kastner (1977), and <br />Osterkamp and Hedman (1982). These <br />investigations have shown that measurements <br />of specific channel-geometry characteristics <br />provide a reliable method (or estimating flood <br />discharges because channel cross-sectional <br />characteristics are assumed to be a function of <br />flow volume and sediment-load transport <br />(Pickup and Rieger, 1979, p. 41; Osterkamp, <br />1979, p. 2). <br /> <br />Purpose and Scope <br /> <br />The purpose of this report is to: (1) define <br />equations for Iowa that relate measurable <br />drainage-basin characteristics to design-flood <br />discharges having recurrence intervals of 2, 5, <br />10, 25, 50, and 100 years that are independent <br />of hydrologic regionalization; (2) define <br />corroborative equations for Iowa that relate <br />channel-geometry ch8racteristics to the same <br />design-flood recurrence intervals; and (3) define <br />application and reliability of drainage-basin and <br />channel-geometry flood-estimation methods. <br /> <br />Both the drainage-basin and channel- <br />geometry flood-estimation methods described in <br /> <br />2 ESTIMATING DESIGN-FLOOD DISCHo\RGES FOR STREAMS IN IOWA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.