Laserfiche WebLink
<br />precipitation intensity (TTF). These primary <br />drainage-basin characteristic measurements <br />and the scale of maps to use for each manual <br />measurement are described in Appendix A and <br />Appendix B. <br /> <br />(B). The topographic maps used to delineate <br />the drainage-divide boundary for this ungaged <br />site are the DMA 1:250,000-scale Fairmont <br />topographic map and the USGS 1:100,000-scale <br />Osceola County map. Contributing drainage <br />area (CDA) is calculated from the primary <br />drainage-basin characteristics total drainage <br />area (TDA) and noncontributing drainage area <br />(NCDA). The drainage-divide boundary for this <br />basin is delineated on the 1:250,000-scale map, <br />and the total drainage area (TDA) for the <br />ungaged site is listed in Larimer (1957, p. 313) <br />as 120 mi2. The total drainage area published <br />for the gaged site, Otter Creek near Ashton <br />(station number 06483460; map number 139, <br />fig. 1), is 88.0 mi2 (table 9). Because the total <br />drainage area of the ungaged site is 136.4 <br />percent of the total drainage area of the gaged <br />site and within the 50- and 150-percent limits <br />for application, the adjustment procedure is <br />determined to be applicable to the ungaged site. <br />Inspection of the 1:IOO,OOO-scale map does not <br />show any noncontributing drainage areas <br />within the drainage-divide boundary of this <br />basin. The contributing drainage area (CDA) for <br />the ungaged site is calculated using equation 10 <br />as <br /> <br />CDA = TDA - NCDA, <br />= 120-0, <br />:::: 120mi2, <br /> <br />(C). Relative relief(RR) for the ungaged site <br />is calculated from the primary drainage-basin <br />characteristics basin relief (BR) and basin <br />perimeter (BP). The difference between the <br />highest elevation contour and the lowest <br />interpolated elevation in the basin measured <br />from the 1:250,000-scale topographic map gives <br />a basin relief of 286 ft. The drainage-divide <br />boundary delineated on the 1:250,000-scale <br />topographic map is used to measure the basin <br />perimeter, which is 57.8 mi. Relative relief(RR) <br />is calculated using equation 11 as <br /> <br />RR = BR <br />BP' <br />286 <br />- 57.8' <br /> <br />:::: 4.95 ftjrni. <br /> <br />(D). Drainage frequency (DF) for the <br />ungaged site is calculated from the primary <br />drainage-basin characteristics number of <br />first-order streams (FOS) and contributing <br />drainage area (CDA). A total of 57 first-order <br />streams are counted within the drainage-divide <br />delineation for the ungaged site on the <br />1:100,OOO-scale topographic map. Drainage <br />frequency (DF) is calculated using equation 12 <br />as <br /> <br />DF = FOS <br />CDA' <br /> <br />57 <br />- 120' <br /> <br />:::: 0.475 first-order streams/mi2. <br /> <br />(F). The 2-year, 24-hour precipitation <br />intensity (TTF) for the ungaged drainage basin <br />is determined from figure 5. Because the <br />drainage-divide boundary of this ungaged site <br />overlies two of the 2-year, 24-hour precipitation <br />intensity polygons shown in figure 5, a weighted <br />average for the basin is computed using <br />equation 19 as outlined in Appendix B. <br />According to figure 5, approximately 60 percent <br />of the total drainage area (TDA) for the ungaged <br />site is located within the polygon labeled as <br />2.85 in., and approximately 40 percent of the <br />total drainage area is located within the polygon <br />labeled as 2.95 in. The weighted average for the <br />2-year, 24-hour precipitation intensity (TTF) is <br />calculated using equation 19 (Appendix B) as <br /> <br />TFF = IA,)(TFF,) + (A,)(TFF,), <br />= (0.60) (2.851 + (0.401 (2.95), <br />:::: 2.89 in. <br /> <br />(G). The 50-year flood estimate for the <br />ungaged site using the drainage-basin equation <br />(table 2) is calculated as <br /> <br />Q50 = 231 (CDA)o.694 <RR)O.656 (DF)OAOl (TTF _ 2.5)0.491, <br /> <br />= 231 (120)0.694 (4.95)0.656 <0.475)0.401 <br />12.89 _ 2.5)049', <br /> <br />= 8,550 ft'/,. <br /> <br />Because Q50 = Q50(db), and Q50(rul (equation <br />17) = SiiOldb) in this example, then Q50(ru) = <br />8,550 ft f s. <br /> <br />APPUCATION AND RELIABILITY OF FLooD.ESTIMATION METHODS 39 <br />