Laserfiche WebLink
<br />channels had stabilized. Commonly, the <br />active-channel portion of the channel will adjust <br />back to natural or stable conditions within <br />approximately 5 to 10 years after channelization <br />occurs (Waite Osterkamp, U.S. Geological <br />Survey, oral commun., October 1992). Two data <br />sets thus were compiled for the <br />channel-geometry multiple-regression analyses: <br />a 157 -station data set that did not include <br />bankfull measurements and a 111-station data <br />set (a subset of the 157-station data set) that <br />included both the active-channel and bankfull <br />measurements. <br /> <br />Channel-Geometry Characteristic <br />Equations <br /> <br />Analysis of Channel-Geometry Data on a <br />Statewide Basis <br /> <br />Multiple-regression analyses initially were <br />performed on both data Eets. Statewide <br />equations were developed for each data set <br />using the ordinary least-squares (OLS) and <br />weighted least-squares (WLS) multiple- <br />regression techniques previously described. The <br />best equations developed in terms of PRESS <br />statistics, coefficients of determination, and <br />standard errors of estimate for E,ach data set are <br />listed in table 3. The channel-geometry <br />characteristics identified as most significant for <br />the Ill-station data set were bankfull width <br />(BFW) and bankfull deptb (BFm. The <br />channel-geometry characteristJ.c identified as <br />most significant in the 157-stat:ion data set was <br />active-channel width (ACW). Table 9 (at end of <br />this report) lists the average values for BFW, <br />BFD, and ACW for the streamflow-gaging <br />stations analyzed in the 111- and 157-station <br />data sets. Appendix C (at end of this report) <br />outlines the procedure for conducting channel- <br />geometry measurements of these <br />characteristics. <br /> <br />Comparison of the average standard errors <br />of prediction listed in table 3 indicate that the <br />data set that included bankfull measurements <br />provided better estimation accuracy for the <br />design-flood discharges investigated in this <br />study than did the active-channel measure- <br />ments in th~ other data set. The size and shape <br />of the channel cross section is assumed to be a <br />function of streamflow discharge and sediment- <br />load transport. The bankfull channel is a longer <br /> <br />term geomorphic feature predominately <br />sculptured by larger magnitude discharges, <br />whereas the active channel is a shorter term <br />geomorphic feature that is sculptured by <br />continuous fluctuations in discharge. Because <br />the design-flood discharge equations developed <br />in this study estimate larger magnitude <br />discharges, a multiple regression relation with <br />better estimation accuracy was defined using <br />bankfull characteristics. <br /> <br />In an attempt to further improve the <br />estimation accuracy of the equations, each <br />gaging station was classified into one of six <br />channel types for which separate multiple- <br />regression analyses were performed. Gaging <br />stations were classified according to channel- <br />type classifications described by Osterkamp and <br />Hedman (1982, p. 8). This classification is based <br />on the results of the sediment-sample analyses <br />of percent silt-clay content (SCbd) and diameter <br />size (Dso) of the channel-bed particles, and the <br />percent silt-clay content of the left (SC1bk)and <br />right bank (SCrbk) material. The channel- <br />geometry flood-estimation equations developed <br />using this procedure were inconclusive because <br />the estimation accuracy of some channel-type <br />equations improved while the estimation <br />accuracy of other equations decreased. An <br />analysis of covariance procedure described by <br />W.O. Thomas, Jr., (U.S. Geological Survey, <br />written commun., 1982), wherein each channel- <br />type classification was identified as a <br />qualitative variable, was used to test whether <br />there was a statistical difference due to <br />channel-type classifications. Based on the <br />results of this analysis, there was no significant <br />difference between the channel-type equations <br />and the equations developed without <br />channel-type classification. Because of the <br />results of these two channel-type analyses, <br />statewide channel-geometry equations classi- <br />fied according to sediment-sample analyses <br />were determined to not significantly improve <br />the estimates of design-flood discharges for <br />streams in Iowa. <br /> <br />Analysis of Channel-Geometry Data by <br />Selected Regions <br /> <br />Examination of residuals for both sets of <br />statewide channel-geometry equations listed in <br />table 3 indicated evidence of geographic bias <br />with respect to the Des Moines Lobe landform <br /> <br />22 ESTIMATING DESIGN. FLOOD DISCIlARGES FOR STREAMS IN IOWA <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />