Laserfiche WebLink
<br />features in the first three of the four GIS digital <br />maps shown in figure 4. As a prerequisite, the <br />digital maps are edited to ensure that <br />drainage-divide boundaries, stream segments, <br />and the basin-length line segments are <br />connected properly. If noncontributing drainage <br />areas are identified, they are assigned <br />attributes with separate polygon designations <br />so that the basin-characteristic programs can <br />distinguish between contributing and <br />noncontributing areas. Each line segment in the <br />drainage-network digital map is assigned a <br />Strahler stream-order number I Strahler, 1952) <br />and a code indicating whether tbe line segment <br />represeQ.ts part of the' main channel or a <br />secondary channel. Specific GIS programs have <br />been developed to assign the proper stream- <br />order number to each line segment and to code <br />those line segments representing the main <br />channel. Figure 4B shows the Strahler <br />stream-order numbers for streams in the Black <br />Hawk Creek at Grundy Center I station number <br />05463090; map number 73, fig. 1) drainage <br />basin. A description on how to order streams <br />using Strahler's method is included in Appendix <br />B (at end of this report). <br /> <br />The line segments in the elevation-contour <br />digital map were assigned elevations from the <br />processing of the OEM data. Line segments <br />overlain by noncontributing drainage-area <br />polygons are assigned attribw:es designating <br />noncontributing contour segments. Two point <br />attributes are added to the elevation-contour <br />digital map to represent the maximum and <br />minimum elevations of the drainage basin. The <br />maximum basin elevation is defined from the <br />highest OEM-generated con'cour elevation <br />within the contributing drainage area. The <br />minimum basin elevation is defined at the basin <br />outlet as an interpolated value between the first <br />elevation contour crossing the main channel <br />upstream of the basin outlet and the first <br />elevation contour crossing the main channel <br />downstream of the basin outlet. <br /> <br />The third step uses the four GIS digital <br />maps shown in figure 4 and a set of programs <br />developed by the USGS (MajurE and Soenksen, <br />1991) to quantify the 24 morphologic basin <br />characteristics listed in Appendix A (at end of <br />this report). These basin characteristics include <br />selected measurements of area, length, shape, <br />and topographic relief that define selected <br /> <br />aspects of basin morphology, and several <br />channel characteristics. The programs access <br />the information automatically maintained by <br />the GIS for each of the four digital maps, such as <br />the length of line segments and the area of <br />polygons, as well as the previously described <br />attribute information assigned to the polygon, <br />line-segment, and point features of three of the <br />four GIS digital maps. The GIS programs then <br />use this information to automatically quantify <br />the 24 morphologic basin characteristics. <br /> <br />The fourth step uses a software program <br />developed to quantify the remaining two basin <br />characteristics listed in Appendix A (at end of <br />this report). These two climatic characteristics <br />are quantified using GIS digital maps <br />representing the distributions of mean annual <br />precipitation and 2-year, 24-hour precipitation <br />intensity for the area contriouting to all <br />surface-water drainage in Iowa. This area <br />includes a portion of southern Minnesota. The <br />mean annual precipitation digital map was <br />digitized from a contour map for Iowa, supplied <br />by the Iowa Department of Agriculture and <br />Land Stewardship, State Climatology Office <br />(Des Moines), and from a contour map for <br />Minnesota (Baker and Kuehnast, 1978). The <br />2-year, 24-hour precipitation intensity digital <br />map was digitized from a contour map for Iowa <br />(Waite, 1988, p. 31) and interpolated contours <br />for southern Minnesota that were digitized from <br />a United States contour map (Hershfield, 1961, <br />p. 95). The digital map representing the <br />distribution of 2-year, 24-hour precipitation <br />intensity for Iowa and southern Minnesota is <br />shown in figure 5. The weighted average for <br />each climatic characteristic is computed for a <br />drainage basin by calculating the mean of the <br />area-weighted precipitation values that are <br />within the drainage-divide polygon. <br /> <br />Of the 26 drainage-basin characteristics <br />listed in Appendix A, 12 are referred to as <br />primary drainage-basin characteristics because <br />they constitute specific GIS procedure or <br />manual topographic-map measurements. They <br />are listed under headings containing the word <br />"measurement." The remaining characteristics <br />are calculated from the primary drainage-basin <br />characteristics; they are listed in Appendix A <br />under headings containing the word <br />"computation." Each drainage-basin character- <br />istic listed in Appendix A is footnoted with a <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br />! <br /> <br />12 ESTlMATING DESIGN.FLOOD DISCHARGES FOR STREAMS IN IOWA <br />