Laserfiche WebLink
<br />flooding, none drain areas large enough to affect the peak flows <br />in the main channel of Uncompahgre River. <br /> <br />Natural obstructions to floodflows within the study reach exist <br />such as brush, small trees, and other streamland vegetation. Some <br />manrnade features such as bridges, culverts, fences, and buildings <br />exist which may act as obstructions by themselves or in combination <br />with floating trees, brush, or transported rocks to cause interrup- <br />tion to the flow. During floods, these obstructions impede flood- <br />flows and cause backwater conditions that may increase the flood <br />heights upstream of the obstruction and velocities downstream of <br />the obstruction. The bridge heights, in combination with high <br />velocity flow in the steep channel grades, carry debris through <br />the openings without structural damage to the bridges. <br /> <br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />In the wider valleys of Ridgway, an attempt has been made to confine <br />flows to the present newer channel by the gra9ing of berms with <br />native alluvial material. These berms provide adequate protection <br />during normal flows, but consist of permeable material that allows <br />water to seep through during flows higher than normal. When these <br />conditions last several days, water will cover areas lower than <br />the 50- and 100-year flood elevations. Erosion of berms during <br />major flows may flood low-lying areas. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the co~unity, standard <br />hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, 50-, 100-, or 500-year period (recurrence interval) have been selec- <br />ted as having special significance for flood plain management and for <br />flood insurance rates. These events, commonly termed the 10-, 50-, 100-, <br />and 500-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1, and 0.2 percent chance, respec- <br />tively, of being equaled or exceeded during any year. Although the <br />recurrence interval represents the long term average period between floods <br />of a specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short intervals or <br />even within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare flood in- <br />creases when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For example, <br />the risk of having a flood which equals or exceeds the lOO-year flood (1 <br />percent chance of annual exceedence) in any 50-year period is approxi- <br />mately 40 percent (4 in 10), and, for any 90-year period, the risk in- <br />creases to approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses reported <br />herein reflect flooding potentials based on conditions existing in the <br />community at the time of completion of this study. Maps and flood ele- <br />vations will be amended periodically to reflect future changes. <br /> <br />5 <br />