My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06421
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:57 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:16:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Highways in the River Environment
Date
2/1/1990
Prepared By
Federal Highway Administration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
708
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I - 15 <br /> <br />1.4 THE EFFECTS OF RIVER DEVELOPMENT ON HIGHWAY <br />ENCROACHMENTS <br /> <br />Some of the possible immediate and delayed responses of rivers and river <br />systems to the construction of bridges, approaches, culverts, channel stabilization, <br />longitudinal encroachments, and the utilization of training works have been <br />mentioned. It is necessary also to consider the effects of hiqhway encroachments on <br />river development works. These works may include, for example, water diversions <br />to and from the river system, construction of reservoirs, flood control works, <br />cutoffs, levees, navigation works, and the mining of sand and gravel. It is essential <br />to consider the possible or probable long-term plans of all agencies and groups as <br />they pertain to a river when designing crossings or when dealing with the river in <br />any way. Let us consider a few typical responses of a crossing to different types of <br />water resources development. <br />Cutoffs may develop naturally in the river system or cutoffs can be constructed <br />by man. The general consequence of cutoffs is to shorten the flow path and steepen <br />the gradient of the channel. The local steepening can significantly increase the <br />velocities and sediment transport. Also, this action can induce significant <br />instability such as bank erosion and degradation in the reach. The material scoured <br />in the reach affected by the cutoff is probably carried only to an adjacent <br />downstream reach where the gradient is flatter. In this region of slower velocities <br />the sediment drops out rapidly. Deposition can have significant detrimental effect <br />on the downstream reach of river, increasing the flood stage in the river itself and <br />increasing the base level for the tributary stream, thereby causing aggradation in <br />the tributaries. <br />Consider a classic example of a cutoff that was constructed on a large bend in <br />one of the tributaries to the Mississippi. Along this bend, small towns had developed <br />and small tributary streams entered the main channel within the bendway. It was <br />decided to develop a cutoff across the gooseneck to shorten the flow line of the <br />river, reduce the flood stage and generally improve poor hydraulic conditions in that <br />location. Several interesting results developed. <br />In the vicinity of the cutoff, the bank line eroded and degradation was initiated. <br />Within the bendway, the small tributaries continued to discharge their water and <br />sediment. Because of the flat gradient in the bend, this channel section could <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.