Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I II <br />I I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br /> <br />3.4 Reservoirs <br /> <br />There are several reservoirs in Costilla County. The major <br />reservoirs are listed in Table 6. Their locations are shown on <br />Figure 4. None of these reservoirs were constructed to provide <br />flood control. Some of the major reservoirs do. however. provide <br />inadvertent flood protection because their capacity is so large <br />relative to projected (and experienced) peak inflows. <br /> <br />There is a stream gage on Trinchera Creek upstream of Mountain <br />Home Reservoir. Although there is no gage downstream of Mountain <br />Home Reservoir. between it and Smith Reservoir. it was decided that <br />no credit would be given to Mountain Home Reservoir for peak flow <br />reduction since it is not a flood control reservoir. Based on <br />analyses of stream gages upstream and downstream of Smith Reservoir. <br />it did not appear that outflows on Trinchera Creek are significantly <br />reduced by that reservoir. Ventero Creek upstream of Sanchez <br />Reservoir was not identified as a stream of concern for floodplain <br />delineation. Since Sanchez Reservoir is not a flood control <br />reservoir. any delineation downstream of the reservoir must assume <br />no flood detention. In its 81 year history Sanchez Reservoir has <br />never been filled. In fact. the closest it has ever come to being <br />filled is approximately 60.000 acre-feet in 1987 out of a capacity <br />of approximately 103.000 acre-feet. On the average about <br />15.000-20.000 acre-feet are stored in Sanchez Reservoir. Despite <br />that history. the hydrologic assumption of no flood detention was <br />observed for Ventero Creek. Downstream of its confluence with <br />Ventero Creek. Culegra Creek's drainage area was assumed to include <br />all of the area tributary to Sanchez Reservoir. The other <br />reservoirs listed in Table 6 are much smaller. They have not been <br />specifically considered to have beneficial flood routing effects. <br /> <br />One reservoir was not listed in Table 6 because it is not in <br />Costilla County. Costilla Reservoir is in northern New Mexico. <br />Garcia. Colorado is about 17 miles downstream of the reservoir. <br />just north of the state line. At that point the drainage area is <br />about 200 square miles. Although Costilla Reservoir is large. only <br />25 sguare miles out of those 200 square miles are tributary to it. <br />The decision was made to consider all 200 square miles. and to <br />assume the reservoir has no significant effect on flows at Garcia. <br /> <br />3.5 lrriqation Ditches <br /> <br />Besides the reservoirs. several irrigation ditches reduce <br />average flows and. to some degree. peak flows along the streams <br />from which they divert water. Perhaps the most significant of <br />these is the Eastdale Ditch on Culebra Creek just downstream of San <br />Luis. Around Fort Garland and Blanca there are large agricultural <br />diversions from Trinchera Creek. There are also significant <br />diversions from Costilla Creek. both in New Mexico and Colorado. <br />Because not enough is known about the operation of these facilities <br />during peak flows. and because this is an approximate study. no <br />specific flow reductions downstream of any of the diversion <br />structures have been included in the hydrologic analysis. <br /> <br />-23- <br />