My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06396
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06396
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:53 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:13:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Mesa
Community
Riverside
Stream Name
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Section 205 Reconnaissance Report for Flood Control
Date
11/1/1991
Prepared For
Mesa County
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />dense palustrine scrub-shrub wetland accented by an abandoned <br />gravel mine which provides open water diversity with a component <br />of emergent marsh. There will not be any impact on the character <br />of this wetland due to the presence of the levee. There will not <br />be a significant change in left bank flooding during high flow <br />events. Increasing the foundation elevations of buildings and <br />dwellings within the Rosevale area will not impact wetlands. If <br />the proposed levee is not constructed, the wetlands on both banks <br />of the river will not change exclusive of those changes <br />associated with natural plant succession and alteration caused by <br />expected high flow events and spring runoff. <br /> <br />Coordination with the U.S. Fish and wildlife field office in <br />Grand Junction on 2 January 1991 revealed that the FWS does not <br />consider the project site as valuable habitat and does not <br />believe that any surveys, studies, or analyses of fish and <br />wildlife issues are warranted. <br /> <br />Noise. Existing noise levels are similar to those <br />associated with a typical residential area. Noise may <br />intermittently reach nuisance levels during operation of railway <br />traffic near the project site. <br /> <br />The major sources of noise at the project site during <br />construction of a levee will result from the operation of heavy <br />construction equipment and from trucks used to haul fill <br />material. According to the FEIS, the maximum equivalent noise <br />generated at the levee site will be expected to be less than 86 <br />decibels on the A-weighted scale (dBA) at a distance of 50 feet <br />from the center of activity. The noise level will be annoying to <br />persons near any selected haulage route, but occurrences would be <br />brief at any single location. The construction noise described <br />in the FEIS would be similar to noise during the levee <br />construction. The adverse effects of construction noise on <br />Riverside residents will be minimal and short term; however, <br />onsite workers will be required to wear hearing protection. <br />There will not be any significant changes in ambient noise levels <br />if the project is not constructed. <br /> <br />Threatened or Endanqered Soecies. The reach of the Colorado <br />River bordering the project site contains threatened and <br />endangered aquatic species indigenous to the Colorado River <br />drainage; i.e., the Colorado squawfish (Ptvchocheilus lucius), <br />humpback chub (Gila cvoha), bony tail chub (Gila eleqans), and the <br />razorback sucker (Xvrauchen texanus), a species currently <br />proposed for Federal listing. Avian species listed as <br />endangered, which are known to seasonally frequent and occupy the <br />affected reach of the river, include the bald eagle (Haliaeetus <br />leucoceohalusl and the peregrine falcon (Falco oereqrinus). One <br />listed mamalian species, the black-footed ferret (Mustela <br />niqrioes), probably existed in the Grand Valley historically, but <br />has not been documented in the immediate vicinity of the proposed <br />project. Due to the setback nature of the levee, impacts to <br />endangered fish are not expected since actual work is not <br /> <br />A-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.