Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> 12 12 <br /> II II <br /> 10 10 <br />- 9 9 <br />. . <br />. . <br />~ ~ <br />u 8 8 u <br />c E <br />- - <br />:%: 7 7 :%: <br />to- . to- <br />11. " 11. <br />lIJ " lIJ <br />6 6 <br />0 ..- 0 <br />..J ,," ..J <br />..J 5 5 ..J <br />~ ..-"- ".... ~ <br />z ~\9-..- ........ z <br /><i 4 ~J" ....." 4 Ci <br /> oJ1.... ,," <br />a: \~ I ",~\O........ a: <br /> ". ~.... <br /> 3 " 0010.",.""" -- 3 <br /> " 'l. ....1 -- <br /> "..... " <br /> ", ,," Rfr-,1\O -- <br /> 2 '" ."......... ?>O~o_---o 2 <br /> -- <br /> -" <br /> -" <br /> - <br /> <br />depth-duration relations for the intermediate ratios of <br />15, 20, and 30 percen t are also plotted in Fig. 2, <br />Incorporating the values for the intermediate ratios <br />with those listed in Tables 1 and 2 results in the <br />standard intensity -duration relationships for various <br />ratios of I-hour to corresponding 24-hour rainfall <br />depth, as shown in Table 3 and Fig. 3. The storm <br />parameters, a, b, and c (Eq. 6) for the standard <br />intensity--duration curves can be evaluated by using <br />the method of least squares with the aid of an <br />optimization technique similar to the method of <br />steepest descent for optimizing an unconstrained <br />problem. The possible relationships between these <br />parameters and the ratio of I-hour to corresponding <br />24-11our rainfall depth were investigated. Such <br />relationships, if existent, can be used to estimate the <br />a, b, and c values at any location in the United States <br />without resorting to all of the 49 isopluvial maps in <br />the Technical Paper No. 40. For this method to be <br /> <br />o <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />valid, at most two isopluvial maps for any frequency, <br />say 10-year I-hour and lO-year 24-hour, are needed <br />so that the ratio of l.hour to corresponding 24-hour <br />rainfall depth can be computed. <br /> <br /> <br />Since the ratio of I-hour to corresponding <br />24-hour rainfall depth in the Technical Paper No. 40 <br />was shown to be nearly independent of frequency as <br />mentioned previously. accuracy-wise it does not <br />really matter which frequency of the two maps is <br />used as long as the present method is valid. However, <br />due mainly to convenience in application, there is <br />definitely an advantage of using 10-year I-hour and <br />lO-year 24-11our maps over the 2.year l.hour and <br />2-year 24-hour key maps, as will be compared later. <br /> <br />Applying the method of least squares and the <br />optimization technique to a set of the rainfall <br />intensities in Table 3 for the same ratio of I-hour to <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />6 12 <br />DURATION (HOUri) <br /> <br />o <br />24 <br /> <br />Figure 2. Rainfall depth-duration diagram for the United States (after U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper <br />No, 40). <br /> <br />15 <br />