Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r. =~~ y <br /> <br />[(1 - c)(l - I.) + (b/ld)] <br />[(I . t.) + (b/td)] I + c <br /> <br />o S t. S I.,..........,...,...... (25) <br /> <br />(3) ForO< -y < 1 <br /> <br />r.=~: )c <br /> <br />((I - c)(1 - I.h) + (b/ld)] <br />[(1 - I.h) + (b/ld)] 1 + e <br /> <br />o S t. S -y...........'....."'.. (26) <br /> <br />r jb)C <br />. \id <br /> <br />((1 - c)(t. - -y)/(1 - -y) + (b/td)] <br />[Ct. - -y)/(1 - -y) + (b/ld)] I +c <br /> <br />I..,.,..... _.....,....... (27) <br /> <br />"I:S t*S <br /> <br />The following normalized hyetograph equations <br />for -b are derived by normalizing Eqs, 14 through 20. <br /> <br />(1)For-y=O <br /> <br />r. = I t.S I ~ e (I: )........... (28) <br />L b \ C(l + ) e [(1 - c)t. - (b/td)] <br />r.=v/ 1 -~ [t.-(b/td)]l+C <br />t. 2: -2- (~) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (29) <br />1- c td <br />(2) For -y= 1 <br /> <br />=~) c (l.!5.)C <br />r. ~d I - c <br /> <br />[(1 - c)(1 - t.) - (b/td)] <br />[(1 - t.) - (b/td)] 1 + c <br /> <br />Os t.S 1.2-(~) ............(30) <br />1 - c td <br /> <br />r.=1 1-r+(~djS t.S 1......(31) <br /> <br />(3) For 0 < -y < 1 <br /> <br />Jb)C(I+ )c [(1-c)(1.t.h)-(b/ld)] <br />r. ~d 1 . ~ [(l _ t.h) _ b/ld)] I ... c <br /> <br />o S t. S -y - 12?c ( ~d ). . . . .. . . . . . . . . (32) <br /> <br />f* = 1 <br /> <br />-y . I ~~ ( ~d) S t. S -y + ~ ( ;d)' (33) <br /> <br />j~)C (~) c <br />r. ~d 1 - c <br /> <br />[(1 - C)(I.. -y)/(1 - -y) - (bltd)J <br />1 +c <br />[Ct. - -y)/(1 - -y). (b/td)] <br /> <br />-y + 2(1 - 'Y) (~) S I. S I "...,.... (34) <br />--r:-c- I d <br /> <br />An inspection of Eqs, 24 through 34 reveals <br />that there are three dimensionless parameters which <br />control the storm pattern. They are b/td' c, and -y. <br />The -y value that indicates the position of the peak in <br />the hyetograph ranges from 0 to 1, but the ranges of <br />the other two values are unknown. There seems to be <br />no apparent physical meaning for b/td and ,c. For <br />illustration, Eqs. 26 and 27 for +b are plotted in Fig. <br />I for -y = 0.3 with various values ofb/td and c.lt can <br />be seen readily from Fig. I that the hyetograph is <br />uniform as c . 0 or b/td . 00. For given b and c <br />values, the storm pattern with b/td . 00 corresponds <br />to the one with td approaching zero. This implies that <br />as a first.order approximation a uniform design <br />hyetograph can be applied to a smaIl drainage area <br />which has a very short time of concentration, tc' In <br />this case, the -y value is no longer important. <br />However, when a drainage area and hence te under <br />consideration are larger and longer, respectively, the <br />position of the peak in the hyetograph (I.e., -y value) <br />becomes more important. In the limit as td .00 or <br />bit d. 0, r. becomes zero everywhere in the <br />hyetograph. <br /> <br />The fact that the parameter, a, is not one of the <br />controlling factors in the formulation of a storm <br />pattern, as manifested itself in the normalized <br />hyetograph equations, Eqs, 24 through 34, suggests <br />the possibility of "standardizing" for each location <br />the values of band c which do not seem to vary with <br />duration. This and other interesting aspects of de~ <br />sign storms derived on the basis of the rainfall <br />intensity-duration-frequency relationships will be <br />further discussed in the following section, <br /> <br />10 <br />